Genomic Classification and Individualized Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma

Francesco Maura(University of Miami), Arjun Raj Rajanna(University of Miami), Bachisio Ziccheddu(University of Miami), Alexandra M. Poos(German Cancer Research Center), Andriy Derkach(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Kylee Maclachlan(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Michael Durante(University of Miami), Benjamin Diamond(University of Miami), Marios Papadimitriou(University of Miami), Faith E. Davies(NYU Langone Health), Eileen M. Boyle(NYU Langone Health), Brian A. Walker(Indiana University Health), Malin Hultcrantz(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Ariosto Silva(Moffitt Cancer Center), Oliver Hampton, Jamie K. Teer(Moffitt Cancer Center), Erin M. Siegel(Moffitt Cancer Center), Niccolò Bolli(University of Milan), Graham Jackson(Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Martin Kaiser(Institute of Cancer Research), Charlotte Pawlyn(University of Leeds), Gordon Cook(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Dickran Kazandjian(University of Miami), Caleb Stein(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Marta Chesi(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Leif Bergsagel(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), K. Elias(Heidelberg University), Hartmut Goldschmidt(Heidelberg University), Katja Weisel(Universität Hamburg), Roland Fenk(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Marc S. Raab(German Cancer Research Center), Fritz Van Rhee(University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences), Saad Z. Usmani(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Kenneth H. Shain(Moffitt Cancer Center), Niels Weinhold(German Cancer Research Center), Gareth J. Morgan(NYU Langone Health), Ola Landgren(University of Miami)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
January 9, 2024
Cited by 118Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) are heterogenous, with overall survival (OS) ranging from months to over 10 years. METHODS To decipher and predict the molecular and clinical heterogeneity of NDMM, we assembled a series of 1,933 patients with available clinical, genomic, and therapeutic data. RESULTS Leveraging a comprehensive catalog of genomic drivers, we identified 12 groups, expanding on previous gene expression–based molecular classifications. To build a model predicting individualized risk in NDMM (IRMMa), we integrated clinical, genomic, and treatment variables. To correct for time-dependent variables, including high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT), and maintenance therapy, a multi-state model was designed. The IRMMa model accuracy was significantly higher than all comparator prognostic models, with a c-index for OS of 0.726, compared with International Staging System (ISS; 0.61), revised-ISS (0.572), and R2-ISS (0.625). Integral to model accuracy was 20 genomic features, including 1q21 gain/amp, del 1p, TP53 loss, NSD2 translocations, APOBEC mutational signatures, and copy-number signatures (reflecting the complex structural variant chromothripsis). IRMMa accuracy and superiority compared with other prognostic models were validated on 256 patients enrolled in the GMMG-HD6 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02495922 ) clinical trial. Individualized patient risks were significantly affected across the 12 genomic groups by different treatment strategies (ie, treatment variance), which was used to identify patients for whom HDM-ASCT is particularly effective versus patients for whom the impact is limited. CONCLUSION Integrating clinical, demographic, genomic, and therapeutic data, to our knowledge, we have developed the first individualized risk-prediction model enabling personally tailored therapeutic decisions for patients with NDMM.


Related Papers