Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma

Michel Attal(Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole), Valérie Lauwers‐Cancès(Santé Publique France), Cyrille Hulin(Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque), Xavier Leleu(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers), Denis Caillot(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne), Martine Escoffre(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes), Bertrand Arnulf(Hôpital Saint-Louis), Margaret Macro(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen), Karim Belhadj, Laurent Garderet(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), Murielle Roussel(Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole), Catherine Payen(Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole), Claire Mathiot, Jean Paul Fermand(Hôpital Saint-Louis), Nathalie Meuleman(Institut Jules Bordet), Sandrine Rollet(Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole), Michelle E. Maglio(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Andrea A. Zeytoonjian(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Edie Weller(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Nikhil C. Munshi(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Kenneth C. Anderson(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Paul G. Richardson(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Thierry Façon(Hôpital Claude Huriez), Hervé Avet‐Loiseau(Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole), Jean‐Luc Harousseau(Santé Publique France), Philippe Moreau
New England Journal of Medicine
April 5, 2017
Cited by 1,229Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation has been the standard treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in adults up to 65 years of age. However, promising data on the use of combination therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) in this population have raised questions about the role and timing of transplantation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 700 patients with multiple myeloma to receive induction therapy with three cycles of RVD and then consolidation therapy with either five additional cycles of RVD (350 patients) or high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation followed by two additional cycles of RVD (350 patients). Patients in both groups received maintenance therapy with lenalidomide for 1 year. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the group that underwent transplantation than in the group that received RVD alone (50 months vs. 36 months; adjusted hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; P<0.001). This benefit was observed across all patient subgroups, including those stratified according to International Staging System stage and cytogenetic risk. The percentage of patients with a complete response was higher in the transplantation group than in the RVD-alone group (59% vs. 48%, P=0.03), as was the percentage of patients in whom minimal residual disease was not detected (79% vs. 65%, P<0.001). Overall survival at 4 years did not differ significantly between the transplantation group and the RVD-alone group (81% and 82%, respectively). The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was significantly higher in the transplantation group than in the RVD-alone group (92% vs. 47%), as were the rates of grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal disorders (28% vs. 7%) and infections (20% vs. 9%). No significant between-group differences were observed in the rates of treatment-related deaths, second primary cancers, thromboembolic events, and peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with multiple myeloma, RVD therapy plus transplantation was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival than RVD therapy alone, but overall survival did not differ significantly between the two approaches. (Supported by Celgene and others; IFM 2009 Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01191060 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis