Long-Term Colorectal-Cancer Incidence and Mortality after Lower Endoscopy

Reiko Nishihara(Harvard University), Kana Wu(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Paul Lochhead(Harvard University), Teppei Morikawa(Harvard University), Xiaoyun Liao(Harvard University), Zhi Rong Qian(Harvard University), Kentaro Inamura(National Institutes of Health), Sun A. Kim(Harvard University), Aya Kuchiba(Harvard University), Mai Yamauchi(Harvard University), Yu Imamura(Harvard University), Walter C. Willett(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Bernard Rosner(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Charles S. Fuchs(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Edward L. Giovannucci(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Shuji Ogino(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Andrew T. Chan(Brigham and Women's Hospital)
New England Journal of Medicine
September 18, 2013
Cited by 1,481Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy provide protection against colorectal cancer, but the magnitude and duration of protection, particularly against cancer of the proximal colon, remain uncertain. METHODS: We examined the association of the use of lower endoscopy (updated biennially from 1988 through 2008) with colorectal-cancer incidence (through June 2010) and colorectal-cancer mortality (through June 2012) among participants in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. RESULTS: Among 88,902 participants followed over a period of 22 years, we documented 1815 incident colorectal cancers and 474 deaths from colorectal cancer. With endoscopy as compared with no endoscopy, multivariate hazard ratios for colorectal cancer were 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.72) after polypectomy, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.53 to 0.68) after negative sigmoidoscopy, and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.52) after negative colonoscopy. Negative colonoscopy was associated with a reduced incidence of proximal colon cancer (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.92). Multivariate hazard ratios for death from colorectal cancer were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.76) after screening sigmoidoscopy and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.45) after screening colonoscopy. Reduced mortality from proximal colon cancer was observed after screening colonoscopy (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.76) but not after sigmoidoscopy. As compared with colorectal cancers diagnosed in patients more than 5 years after colonoscopy or without any prior endoscopy, those diagnosed in patients within 5 years after colonoscopy were more likely to be characterized by the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) (multivariate odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.14 to 4.21) and microsatellite instability (multivariate odds ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.02). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy were associated with a reduced incidence of cancer of the distal colorectum; colonoscopy was also associated with a modest reduction in the incidence of proximal colon cancer. Screening colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy were associated with reduced colorectal-cancer mortality; only colonoscopy was associated with reduced mortality from proximal colon cancer. Colorectal cancer diagnosed within 5 years after colonoscopy was more likely than cancer diagnosed after that period or without prior endoscopy to have CIMP and microsatellite instability. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis