Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis

Stephen L. Hauser(University of California, San Francisco), Amit Bar‐Or(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Jeffrey Cohen(Cleveland Clinic), Gıancarlo Comı(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Jorge Correale(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Patricia K. Coyle(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Anne H. Cross(Washington University in St. Louis), de Sèze(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), David Leppert(Hospital Base), Xavier Montalbán(Hebron University), Krzysztof Selmaj(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Heinz Wiendl(University of Münster), Cécile Kerloëguen(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Roman Willi(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Bingbing Li(Novartis (France)), Algirdas Kakarieka(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Davorka Tomic(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Alexandra Goodyear(Novartis (France)), Ratnakar Pingili(Novartis (France)), Dieter A. Häring(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Krishnan Ramanathan(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Martin Merschhemke(Multiple Sclerosis Research Institute), Ludwig Kappos(University of Basel)
New England Journal of Medicine
August 5, 2020
Cited by 690Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab, a subcutaneous anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, selectively depletes B cells. Teriflunomide, an oral inhibitor of pyrimidine synthesis, reduces T-cell and B-cell activation. The relative effects of these two drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis are not known. METHODS: In two double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive subcutaneous ofatumumab (20 mg every 4 weeks after 20-mg loading doses at days 1, 7, and 14) or oral teriflunomide (14 mg daily) for up to 30 months. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. Secondary end points included disability worsening confirmed at 3 months or 6 months, disability improvement confirmed at 6 months, the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, the annualized rate of new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted MRI, serum neurofilament light chain levels at month 3, and change in brain volume. RESULTS: Overall, 946 patients were assigned to receive ofatumumab and 936 to receive teriflunomide; the median follow-up was 1.6 years. The annualized relapse rates in the ofatumumab and teriflunomide groups were 0.11 and 0.22, respectively, in trial 1 (difference, -0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.16 to -0.06; P<0.001) and 0.10 and 0.25 in trial 2 (difference, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.09; P<0.001). In the pooled trials, the percentage of patients with disability worsening confirmed at 3 months was 10.9% with ofatumumab and 15.0% with teriflunomide (hazard ratio, 0.66; P = 0.002); the percentage with disability worsening confirmed at 6 months was 8.1% and 12.0%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = 0.01); and the percentage with disability improvement confirmed at 6 months was 11.0% and 8.1% (hazard ratio, 1.35; P = 0.09). The number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted MRI scan, the annualized rate of lesions on T2-weighted MRI, and serum neurofilament light chain levels, but not the change in brain volume, were in the same direction as the primary end point. Injection-related reactions occurred in 20.2% in the ofatumumab group and in 15.0% in the teriflunomide group (placebo injections). Serious infections occurred in 2.5% and 1.8% of the patients in the respective groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with multiple sclerosis, ofatumumab was associated with lower annualized relapse rates than teriflunomide. (Funded by Novartis; ASCLEPIOS I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02792218 and NCT02792231.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis