ECTRIMS/EAN Guideline on the pharmacological treatment of people with multiple sclerosis

Xavier Montalbán(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Ralf Gold(St. Josef-Hospital), Alan J. Thompson(Allen Institute for Brain Science), Susana Otero-Romero(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Maria Pia Amato(University of Florence), Dhia Chandraratna(Multiple Sclerosis International Federation), M. Clanet(Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées), Gıancarlo Comı(Vita-Salute San Raffaele University), Tobias Derfuß(University Hospital of Basel), Franz Fazekas(Medical University of Graz), Hans Hartung(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Eva Havrdová(Charles University), Bernhard Hemmer(Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology), Ludwig Kappos(University Hospital of Basel), Roland Liblau(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Catherine Lubetzki(Sorbonne Université), Elena Marcus(University College London), David H. Miller(National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery), Tomas Olsson(Karolinska University Hospital), Steve Pilling(University College London), Krzysztof Selmaj(Medical University of Lodz), Aksel Sıva(Istanbul University), Per Soelberg Sørensen(Copenhagen University Hospital), Maria Pia Sormani(University of Genoa), Christoph Thalheim(European Platform of Women Scientists), Heinz Wiendl(University of Münster), Frauke Zipp(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz)
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
January 20, 2018
Cited by 700Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease with new drugs becoming available in the past years. There is a need for a reference tool compiling current data to aid professionals in treatment decisions. OBJECTIVES: To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of people with MS. METHODS: This guideline has been developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology and following the updated EAN recommendations. Clinical questions were formulated in Patients-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome (PICO) format and outcomes were prioritized. The quality of evidence was rated into four categories according to the risk of bias. The recommendations with assigned strength (strong and weak) were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance. Consensus between the panelists was reached by use of the modified nominal group technique. RESULTS: A total of 10 questions were agreed, encompassing treatment efficacy, response criteria, strategies to address suboptimal response and safety concerns and treatment strategies in MS and pregnancy. The guideline takes into account all disease-modifying drugs approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) at the time of publication. A total of 21 recommendations were agreed by the guideline working group after three rounds of consensus. CONCLUSION: The present guideline will enable homogeneity of treatment decisions across Europe.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis