Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Stephen L. Hauser(University of California, San Francisco), Amit Bar‐Or(McGill University), Gıancarlo Comı(University of British Columbia), Gavin Giovannoni(Queen Mary University of London), Hans‐Peter Hartung(University of British Columbia), Bernhard Hemmer(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Fred Lublin(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Xavier Montalbán(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Kottil Rammohan(University of British Columbia), Krzysztof Selmaj(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Anthony Traboulsee(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Jerry S. Wolinsky(University of British Columbia), Douglas L. Arnold(NeuroRx Research (Canada)), Gaëlle Klingelschmitt(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Donna Masterman(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Paulo Fontoura(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Shibeshih Belachew(Roche (Switzerland)), Peter Chin(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Nicole Mairon(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Hideki Garren(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Ludwig Kappos(University of British Columbia)
New England Journal of Medicine
December 21, 2016
Cited by 1,940Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. METHODS: In two identical phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned 821 and 835 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive intravenous ocrelizumab at a dose of 600 mg every 24 weeks or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a at a dose of 44 μg three times weekly for 96 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. RESULTS: -weighted magnetic resonance scan was 0.02 with ocrelizumab versus 0.29 with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (94% lower number of lesions with ocrelizumab, P<0.001) and 0.02 versus 0.42 in trial 2 (95% lower number of lesions, P<0.001). The change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score (a composite measure of walking speed, upper-limb movements, and cognition; for this z score, negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement) significantly favored ocrelizumab over interferon beta-1a in trial 2 (0.28 vs. 0.17, P=0.004) but not in trial 1 (0.21 vs. 0.17, P=0.33). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 34.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab. Serious infection occurred in 1.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 2.9% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Neoplasms occurred in 0.5% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 0.2% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of disease activity and progression than interferon beta-1a over a period of 96 weeks. Larger and longer studies of the safety of ocrelizumab are required. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; OPERA I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01247324 and NCT01412333 , respectively.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis