J

J. W. Wladimiroff

Erasmus MC

Publishes on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics, Congenital Heart Disease Studies. 123 papers and 3.5k citations.

123Publications
3.5kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

The risk of spina bifida aperta after first-trimester exposure to valproate in a prenatal cohort.
Cited by 256

Use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations. Spina bifida aperta has been linked specifically to valproic acid (VPA) (estimated risk, 1 to 2%). The actual risk, the exclusive association of VPA with spina bifida and not anencephaly, and the precise causative relation remain matters of discussion. A prospective cohort study of pregnant women with epilepsy receiving AEDs and referred for prenatal diagnosis before week 22 of gestation was conducted, with follow-up to 3 months after birth. Pregnancies (291 singleton and 6 twin) in 261 women were evaluated. The prevalence of anomalies after exposure to any AED was 6.9%. For fetuses exposed to VPA, the prevalence was 9.4%, including six cases of spina bifida, two of which were in monozygotic twins (giving a prevalence rate of 6.3%, or 5.4%, if twins counted as one). Spina bifida was associated with a significantly higher average daily dose of VPA as compared with pregnancies with normal outcome (1.640 +/- 136 mg/d vs 941 +/- 48 mg/d, p = 0.0001). No relation was observed between the occurrence of spina bifida and type of maternal seizure or epilepsy, family history of epilepsy or neural-tube defects, or medical history. From these results we suggest that when the use of VPA during pregnancy cannot be avoided, the teratogenic risk might be diminished by reduction of the daily dose.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an evaluation of the prognostic value of the lung‐to‐head ratio and other prenatal parameters
J. A. M. Laudy, M. Van Gucht, M. F. van Dooren et al.|Prenatal Diagnosis|2003
Cited by 184

OBJECTIVES: A retrospective analysis of the prognostic significance of the lung-to-head ratio (LHR) and other prenatal parameters on the outcome of fetuses with left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: A total of 26 fetuses with isolated left CDH without chromosomal abnormalities were included. Twenty-one LHR measurements could retrospectively be calculated from the last available ultrasonographic recordings before birth. The relationship between LHR and fetal outcome and the gestational age dependency of this relation was tested. Cutoff levels as previously published were applied to determine their predictive value in this population. The association between other prenatal predictive variables and fetal outcome was also determined. Survival was defined as discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 50%. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean LHR of the survivors compared to the mean LHR of the nonsurvivors (1.78 vs 1.02), whereas the mean gestational age of these two groups did not differ. LHR was not gestational age dependent in the prediction of fetal outcome. The cutoff levels LHR <1, 1-1.4, >1.4 showed a good applicability in the prediction of fetal outcome within the present study population with a 100% survival if LHR >1.4 and a 100% mortality if LHR <1. An intrathoracic position of the stomach, mediastinal shift, polyhydramnios as individual variables and early diagnosis (<25 weeks' gestation) revealed to be poor sonographic predictors for fetal outcome. CONCLUSION: LHR proved to be a good predictor for fetal outcome, independent of gestational age at the time of the measurement. To substantiate our observation, a prospective multicenter study is warranted.

How to discriminate between normal and polycystic ovaries: transvaginal US study.
Cited by 182

Transvaginal sonography was used in 29 women with regular menstrual cycles and 52 patients with the polycystic ovary syndrome to determine cutoff levels in the size and number of ovarian follicles and ovarian echogenicity and volume for diagnosis of polycystic ovaries. Median values of the mean size and number of follicles and ovarian volume were, respectively, 5.1 mm, 5.0, and 5.9 mL in control subjects and 3.8 mm, 9.8, and 9.8 mL in patients. Ovarian stroma echogenicity was normal in 26 control subjects (90%) and moderately increased in three control subjects (10%), whereas it was markedly increased in 28 patients (54%), moderately increased in 21 patients (40%), and normal in 13 patients (6%). The sensitivity and specificity of moderately or markedly increased echogenicity of ovarian stroma in the diagnosis of polycystic ovaries was 94% and 90%, respectively. The greatest power of discrimination between normal and polycystic ovaries was obtained with combined measurement of follicular size and ovarian volume (sensitivity, 92% [48 of 52 patients]; specificity, 97% [28 of 29 control subjects]).