Jing Wang

Abstract While the BA.2.86 variant demonstrated significant antigenic drift and enhanced ACE2 binding affinity, its ability to evade humoral immunity was relatively moderate compared to dominant strains like EG.5 and HK.3. However, the emergence of a new subvariant, JN.1 (BA.2.86.1.1), which possesses an additional spike mutation, L455S, compared to BA.2.86, showed a markedly increased prevalence in Europe and North America, especially in France. Here, we found that L455S of JN.1 significantly enhances immune evasion capabilities at the expense of reduced ACE2 binding affinity. This mutation enables JN.1 to effectively evade Class 1 neutralizing antibodies, offsetting BA.2.86’s susceptibility and thus allowing it to outcompete both its precursor BA.2.86 and the prevailing variants HV.1 (XBB.1.5+L452R+F456L) and JD.1.1 (XBB.1.5+L455F+F456L+A475V) in terms of humoral immune evasion. The rapid evolution from BA.2.86 to JN.1, similar to the earlier transition from BA.2.75 to CH.1.1, highlights the importance of closely monitoring strains with high ACE2 binding affinity and distinct antigenicity, despite their temporarily unremarkable immune evasion capabilities. Such strains could survive and transmit at low levels, since their large antigenic distance to dominant strains allow them to target distinct populations and accumulate immune-evasive mutations rapidly, often at the cost of receptor binding affinity.

Abstract The continuous evolution of SARS-CoV-2, particularly the emergence of the BA.2.86/JN.1 lineage replacing XBB lineages, necessitates re-evaluation of current vaccine compositions. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the humoral immune response to XBB and JN.1 human exposures, emphasizing the need for JN.1-lineage-based boosters. We demonstrate the antigenic distinctiveness of XBB and JN.1 lineages in SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals but not in those with prior vaccinations or infections, and JN.1 infection elicits superior plasma neutralization titers against its subvariants. We highlight the strong immune evasion and receptor binding capability of KP.3, supporting its foreseeable prevalence. Extensive analysis of the BCR repertoire, isolating ∼2000 RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with their targeting epitopes characterized by deep mutational scanning (DMS), underscores the systematic superiority of JN.1-elicited memory B cells (MBCs). Notably, Class 1 IGHV3-53/3-66-derived neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) contribute majorly within wildtype (WT)-reactive NAbs against JN.1. However, KP.2 and KP.3 evade a substantial subset of them, even those induced by JN.1, advocating for booster updates to KP.3 for optimized enrichment. JN.1-induced Omicron-specific antibodies also demonstrate high potency across all Omicron lineages. Escape hotspots of these NAbs have mainly been mutated in Omicron RBD, resulting in higher immune barrier to escape, considering the probable recovery of previously escaped NAbs. Additionally, the prevalence of broadly reactive IGHV3-53/3-66- encoding antibodies and MBCs, and their capability of competing with all Omicron-specific NAbs suggests their inhibitory role on the de novo activation of Omicron-specific naive B cells, potentially explaining the heavy immune imprinting in mRNA-vaccinated individuals. These findings delineate the evolving antibody response to Omicron antigenic shift from XBB to JN.1, and highlight the importance of developing JN.1 lineage, especially KP.3-based vaccine boosters, to enhance humoral immunity against current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) are used to treat and prevent COVID-19. However, the rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 drives continuous escape from therapeutic mAbs. Therefore, the ability to identify broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) against future variants is needed. Here, we use deep mutational scanning (DMS) to predict viral RBD evolution and to select for mAbs neutralizing both existing and prospective variants. A retrospective analysis of 1,103 SARS-CoV-2 wildtype-elicited mAbs shows that this method can increase the probability of identifying effective bnAbs against the XBB.1.5 strain from 1% to 40% in an early pandemic setup. Among these bnAbs, BD55-1205 exhibited potent activity against all tested variants. Cryo-EM structural analyses revealed the receptor mimicry of BD55-1205, explaining its broad reactivity. Delivery of mRNA-LNPs encoding BD55-1205-IgG in mice resulted in ~5,000 serum NT 50 against XBB.1.5, HK.3.1, and JN.1 variants. Combining bnAb identification using viral evolution prediction with the versatility of mRNA delivery technology can enable rapid development of next-generation antibody-based countermeasures against SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other pathogens with pandemic potential.

Abstract Omicron sub-lineage BA.2 has rapidly surged globally, accounting for over 60% of recent SARS-CoV-2 infections. Newly acquired RBD mutations and high transmission advantage over BA.1 urge the investigation of BA.2’s immune evasion capability. Here, we show that BA.2 causes strong neutralization resistance, comparable to BA.1, in vaccinated individuals’ plasma. However, BA.2 displays more severe antibody evasion in BA.1 convalescents, and most prominently, in vaccinated SARS convalescents’ plasma, suggesting a substantial antigenicity difference between BA.2 and BA.1. To specify, we determined the escaping mutation profiles 1,2 of 714 SARS-CoV-2 RBD neutralizing antibodies, including 241 broad sarbecovirus neutralizing antibodies isolated from SARS convalescents, and measured their neutralization efficacy against BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2. Importantly, BA.2 specifically induces large-scale escape of BA.1/BA.1.1-effective broad sarbecovirus neutralizing antibodies via novel mutations T376A, D405N, and R408S. These sites were highly conserved across sarbecoviruses, suggesting that Omicron BA.2 arose from immune pressure selection instead of zoonotic spillover. Moreover, BA.2 reduces the efficacy of S309 (Sotrovimab) 3,4 and broad sarbecovirus neutralizing antibodies targeting the similar epitope region, including BD55-5840. Structural comparisons of BD55-5840 in complexes with BA.1 and BA.2 spike suggest that BA.2 could hinder antibody binding through S371F-induced N343-glycan displacement. Intriguingly, the absence of G446S mutation in BA.2 enabled a proportion of 440-449 linear epitope targeting antibodies to retain neutralizing efficacy, including COV2-2130 (Cilgavimab) 5 . Together, we showed that BA.2 exhibits distinct antigenicity compared to BA.1 and provided a comprehensive profile of SARS-CoV-2 antibody escaping mutations. Our study offers critical insights into the humoral immune evading mechanism of current and future variants.