Jean-Serge Rémy

The beta-galactosidase reporter gene, either free or complexed with various cationic vectors, was microinjected into mammalian cells. Cationic lipids but not polyethylenimine or polylysine prevent transgene expression when complexes are injected in the nucleus. Polyethylenimine and to a lesser extent polylysine, but not cationic lipids, enhance transgene expression when complexes are injected into the cytoplasm. This latter effect was independent of the polymer vector/cDNA ionic charge ratio, suggesting that nucleic acid compaction rather than surface charge was critical for efficient nuclear trafficking. Cell division was not required for nuclear entry. Finally, comparative transfection and microinjection experiments with various cell lines confirm that barriers to gene transfer vary with cell type. We conclude that polymers but not cationic lipids promote gene delivery from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and that transgene expression in the nucleus is prevented by complexation with cationic lipids but not with cationic polymers.

In order to enhance and target gene delivery we have previously established a novel method, termed magnetofection, which uses magnetic force acting on gene vectors that are associated with magnetic particles. Here we review the benefits, the mechanism and the potential of the method with regard to overcoming physical limitations to gene delivery. Magnetic particle chemistry and physics are discussed, followed by a detailed presentation of vector formulation and optimization work. While magnetofection does not necessarily improve the overall performance of any given standard gene transfer method in vitro, its major potential lies in the extraordinarily rapid and efficient transfection at low vector doses and the possibility of remotely controlled vector targeting in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Cell transfection requires cationic DNA complexes and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) at the cell surface. Syndecans are transmembrane HSPGs that are ubiquitously expressed on adherent cells. Their polyanionic heparan sulfate moieties are bound at the distal end of their ectodomain, thus facilitating interaction with large cationic particles. METHODS: We propose a model for cell entry involving syndecans as receptors for the DNA complexes by comparing transfection with bacteria uptake and using drug inhibition experiments along with confocal microscopy. RESULTS: When combined with results from the literature, our data suggest the following sequence of events: after initial particle binding, gradual electrostatic zippering of the plasma membrane onto the particle is sustained by lateral diffusion of syndecan molecules that cluster into cholesterol-rich rafts. Clustering in turn triggers PKC activity and linker protein-mediated actin binding to the cytoplasmic tail of the syndecans. Resulting tension fibers and a growing network of cortical actin may then pull the particle into the cell. CONCLUSIONS: Diversion of integrin- and syndecan-mediated cell adhesion processes for particle engulfment appears to be widely exploited by animals (chylomicrons), by pathogens (bacteria, viruses) and, as suggested here, by non-viral vectors.

BACKGROUND: Several nonviral vectors including linear polyethylenimine (L-PEI) confer a pronounced lung tropism to plasmid DNA when injected into the mouse tail vein in a nonionic solution. METHODS: and results We have optimized this route by injecting 50 microg DNA with excess L-PEI (PEI nitrogen/DNA phosphate = 10) in a large volume of 5% glucose (0.4 ml). In these conditions, 1-5% of lung cells were transfected (corresponding to 2 ng luciferase/mg protein), the other organs remaining essentially refractory to transfection (1-10 pg luciferase/mg protein). beta-Galactosidase histochemistry confirmed alveolar cells, including pneumocytes, to be the main target, thus leading to the puzzling observation that the lung microvasculature must be permeable to cationic L-PEI/DNA particles of ca 60 nm. A smaller injected volume, premixing of the complexes with autologous mouse serum, as well as removal of excess free L-PEI, all severely decreased transgene expression in the lung. Arterial or portal vein delivery did not increase transgene expression in other organs. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that effective lung transfection primarily depends on the injection conditions: the large nonionic glucose bolus prevents aggregation as well as mixing of the cationic complexes and excess free L-PEI with blood. This may favour vascular leakage in the region where the vasculature is dense and fragile, i.e. around the lung alveoli. Cationic particles can thus reach the epithelium from the basolateral side where their receptors (heparan sulphate proteoglycans) are abundant.