B

Barbara Demeneix

Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle

ORCID: 0000-0003-4544-971X

Publishes on Thyroid Disorders and Treatments, Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals, RNA Interference and Gene Delivery. 239 papers and 15.7k citations.

239Publications
15.7kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine.
Otmane Boussif, Frank Lezoualc’h, Maria Antonietta Zanta et al.|Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|1995
Cited by 6.2kOpen Access

Several polycations possessing substantial buffering capacity below physiological pH, such as lipopolyamines and polyamidoamine polymers, are efficient transfection agents per se--i.e., without the addition of cell targeting or membrane-disruption agents. This observation led us to test the cationic polymer polyethylenimine (PEI) for its gene-delivery potential. Indeed, every third atom of PEI is a protonable amino nitrogen atom, which makes the polymeric network an effective "proton sponge" at virtually any pH. Luciferase reporter gene transfer with this polycation into a variety of cell lines and primary cells gave results comparable to, or even better than, lipopolyamines. Cytotoxicity was low and seen only at concentrations well above those required for optimal transfection. Delivery of oligonucleotides into embryonic neurons was followed by using a fluorescent probe. Virtually all neurons showed nuclear labeling, with no toxic effects. The optimal PEI cation/anion balance for in vitro transfection is only slightly on the cationic side, which is advantageous for in vivo delivery. Indeed, intracerebral luciferase gene transfer into newborn mice gave results comparable (for a given amount of DNA) to the in vitro transfection of primary rat brain endothelial cells or chicken embryonic neurons. Together, these properties make PEI a promising vector for gene therapy and an outstanding core for the design of more sophisticated devices. Our hypothesis is that its efficiency relies on extensive lysosome buffering that protects DNA from nuclease degradation, and consequent lysosomal swelling and rupture that provide an escape mechanism for the PEI/DNA particles.

Human Health and Ocean Pollution
Philip J. Landrigan, John J. Stegeman, Lora E. Fleming et al.|Annals of Global Health|2020
Cited by 732Open Access

Background: Pollution - unwanted waste released to air, water, and land by human activity - is the largest environmental cause of disease in the world today. It is responsible for an estimated nine million premature deaths per year, enormous economic losses, erosion of human capital, and degradation of ecosystems. Ocean pollution is an important, but insufficiently recognized and inadequately controlled component of global pollution. It poses serious threats to human health and well-being. The nature and magnitude of these impacts are only beginning to be understood. Goals: (1) Broadly examine the known and potential impacts of ocean pollution on human health. (2) Inform policy makers, government leaders, international organizations, civil society, and the global public of these threats. (3) Propose priorities for interventions to control and prevent pollution of the seas and safeguard human health. Methods: Topic-focused reviews that examine the effects of ocean pollution on human health, identify gaps in knowledge, project future trends, and offer evidence-based guidance for effective intervention. Environmental Findings: Pollution of the oceans is widespread, worsening, and in most countries poorly controlled. It is a complex mixture of toxic metals, plastics, manufactured chemicals, petroleum, urban and industrial wastes, pesticides, fertilizers, pharmaceutical chemicals, agricultural runoff, and sewage. More than 80% arises from land-based sources. It reaches the oceans through rivers, runoff, atmospheric deposition and direct discharges. It is often heaviest near the coasts and most highly concentrated along the coasts of low- and middle-income countries. Plastic is a rapidly increasing and highly visible component of ocean pollution, and an estimated 10 million metric tons of plastic waste enter the seas each year. Mercury is the metal pollutant of greatest concern in the oceans; it is released from two main sources - coal combustion and small-scale gold mining. Global spread of industrialized agriculture with increasing use of chemical fertilizer leads to extension of Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) to previously unaffected regions. Chemical pollutants are ubiquitous and contaminate seas and marine organisms from the high Arctic to the abyssal depths. Ecosystem Findings: species. Industrial discharges, pharmaceutical wastes, pesticides, and sewage contribute to global declines in fish stocks. Human Health Findings: infections, including cholera, will increase in frequency and extend to new areas. All of the health impacts of ocean pollution fall disproportionately on vulnerable populations in the Global South - environmental injustice on a planetary scale. Conclusions: Ocean pollution is a global problem. It arises from multiple sources and crosses national boundaries. It is the consequence of reckless, shortsighted, and unsustainable exploitation of the earth's resources. It endangers marine ecosystems. It impedes the production of atmospheric oxygen. Its threats to human health are great and growing, but still incompletely understood. Its economic costs are only beginning to be counted.Ocean pollution can be prevented. Like all forms of pollution, ocean pollution can be controlled by deploying data-driven strategies based on law, policy, technology, and enforcement that target priority pollution sources. Many countries have used these tools to control air and water pollution and are now applying them to ocean pollution. Successes achieved to date demonstrate that broader control is feasible. Heavily polluted harbors have been cleaned, estuaries rejuvenated, and coral reefs restored.Prevention of ocean pollution creates many benefits. It boosts economies, increases tourism, helps restore fisheries, and improves human health and well-being. It advances the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). These benefits will last for centuries. Recommendations: World leaders who recognize the gravity of ocean pollution, acknowledge its growing dangers, engage civil society and the global public, and take bold, evidence-based action to stop pollution at source will be critical to preventing ocean pollution and safeguarding human health.Prevention of pollution from land-based sources is key. Eliminating coal combustion and banning all uses of mercury will reduce mercury pollution. Bans on single-use plastic and better management of plastic waste reduce plastic pollution. Bans on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) have reduced pollution by PCBs and DDT. Control of industrial discharges, treatment of sewage, and reduced applications of fertilizers have mitigated coastal pollution and are reducing frequency of HABs. National, regional and international marine pollution control programs that are adequately funded and backed by strong enforcement have been shown to be effective. Robust monitoring is essential to track progress.Further interventions that hold great promise include wide-scale transition to renewable fuels; transition to a circular economy that creates little waste and focuses on equity rather than on endless growth; embracing the principles of green chemistry; and building scientific capacity in all countries.Designation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) will safeguard critical ecosystems, protect vulnerable fish stocks, and enhance human health and well-being. Creation of MPAs is an important manifestation of national and international commitment to protecting the health of the seas.

Efficient gene transfer into mammalian primary endocrine cells with lipopolyamine-coated DNA.
Jean‐Paul Behr, Barbara Demeneix, Jean-Philippe Loeffler et al.|Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|1989
Cited by 720Open Access

A general and efficient transfection procedure, based on compacted lipopolyamine-coated plasmids, has been developed. The active species is obtained by simple addition of excess synthetic lipospermine solution to the DNA and binds within minutes to the cell membrane. This technique has been developed on endocrine cells of the intermediate lobe of the pituitary as a general tool for physiological work on primary cells; it is not toxic and does not interfere with physiological regulations in melanotrope cells. A variety of eukaryotic cell cultures also have been transfected with success for transient and stable expression.

A Powerful Nonviral Vector for <i>In Vivo</i> Gene Transfer into the Adult Mammalian Brain: Polyethylenimine
Bassima Abdallah, Ahmed Hassan, Corinne Benoist et al.|Human Gene Therapy|1996
Cited by 542

Nonviral gene transfer into the central nervous system (CNS) offers the prospect of providing safe therapies for neurological disorders and manipulating gene expression for studying neuronal function. However, results reported so far have been disappointing. We show that the cationic polymer polyethylenimine (PEI) provides unprecedentedly high levels of transgene expression in the mature mouse brain. Three different preparations of PEI (25-, 50-, and 800-kD) were compared for their transfection efficiencies in the brains of adult mice. The highest levels of transfection were obtained with the 25-kD polymer. With this preparation, DNA/PEI complexes bearing mean ionic charge ratios closest to neutrality gave the best results. Under such conditions, and using a cytomegalovirus (CMV)-luciferase construction, we obtained up to 0.4 10(6) RLU/microgram DNA (equivalent to 0.4 ng of luciferase), which is close to the values obtained using PEI to transfect neuronal cultures and the more easily transfected newborn mouse brain (10(6) RLU/microgram DNA). Widespread expression (over 6 mm3) of marker (luciferase) or functional genes (bcl2) was obtained in neurons and glia after injection into the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and hypothalamus. Transgene expression was found more than 3 months post-injection in cortical neurons. No morbidity was observed with any of the preparations used. Thus, PEI, a low-toxicity vector, appears to have potential for fundamental research and genetic therapy of the brain.

Direct Gene Transfer into Skeletal Muscle <i>In Vivo</i> : Factors Affecting Efficiency of Transfer and Stability of Expression
Cited by 373

Striated muscle is the only tissue found to be capable of taking up and expressing reporter genes that are transferred in the form of plasmid DNA. Thus, direct gene transfer is a potential method of gene therapy for the primary inherited myopathies. However, results to date have had insufficient and too variable expression to consider using direct gene transfer in human trials. We have determined that much of the variability of expression is due to nonuniform distribution of substances injected into skeletal muscle in vivo, and have developed a model to ameliorate this. Preinjection of muscles with a relatively large volume of hypertonic sucrose improves the distribution of injected substances and results in significantly less variable expression of reporter genes for luciferase or β-galactosidase; the coefficient of variation for mean luciferase activity was reduced from about 120% to 25%. Expression is not directly proportional to dose, but is more so if the muscles are preinjected with sucrose than not. Expression is higher and less variable if DNA is injected in a larger than a smaller volume. The choice of promoter appears to be particularly important. Luciferase reporter gene expression from the SV40 promoter was transient and low, whereas expression driven by the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promoter was high and sustained, such that a 1,000-fold difference in expression could be observed. The mechanism of gene uptake is still unknown, but our findings indicate that fibers damaged by the injection procedure do not take up and express plasmid DNA. The technique of direct gene transfer into muscle by intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA has been improved by introducing a preinjection procedure. Although the levels of expression are still insufficient to consider human trials of gene therapy for treatment of inherited primary myopathies, this method offers an excellent animal model to evaluate physiological regulation of gene expression in muscle. In addition, direct gene transfer may provide a simple and safe method to deliver recombinant proteins to the circulation in order to treat other (i.e., nonmuscle) inherited disorders.