P. Müller

PURPOSE: To compare the usefulness of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with focal liver lesions underwent T2- and T1-weighted spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fast low-angle shot two-dimensional MR imaging before, during, and after intravenous administration of three different doses of Gd-EOB-DTPA (12.5, 25, and 50 mumol per kilogram body weight). Gd-DTPA-enhanced imaging (dose, 0.1 mmol per kilogram body weight) was performed in the same patients within 1 week of Gd-EOB-DTPA imaging. RESULTS: During the perfusion phase (the 3 minutes after injection of contrast material), the dynamic enhancement characteristics seen after injection of 25 and 50 mumol of Gd-EOB-DTPA were similar to those seen with Gd-DTPA. At the lowest dose of Gd-EOB-DTPA (12.5 mumol), the dynamic enhancement characteristics were not comparable to those seen with Gd-DTPA. During the hepatobiliary phase (1.5 minutes to 4 hours after injection), Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced images yielded a dose-independent, statistically significant improvement in the detection rate of additional metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas compared with unenhanced and Gd-DTPA-enhanced images (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging enables improved detection of hepatic lesions over Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging while providing comparable differential diagnostic information.

PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phase II study, 20 patients with 33 metastases from colorectal carcinoma (75%) or other primary tumors (25%) underwent LITT. MR thermometry performed with fast low-angle shot sequences was used to monitor therapy on-line, and dynamic and static contrast material-enhanced MR images enabled estimation of the degree of resultant necrosis. Follow-up studies were performed 3 months after thermotherapy. RESULTS: The thermosequences enabled accurate on-line monitoring in 85% of lesions. In 69% of lesions 20 mm in diameter or smaller, contrast-enhanced MR images depicted substantial necrosis, with a local tumor control rate of 69% after 6 months and 44% after 12 months. Among lesions larger than 20 mm, necrosis was frequently incomplete, with a local control rate of only 41% after 6 months and 27% after 12 months. CONCLUSION: MR imaging-guided LITT of liver metastases is a safe and promising therapy for liver metastases.

PURPOSE: To assess AMI-25- versus gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differential diagnosis of liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with liver tumors underwent unenhanced, AMI-25-enhanced (15 micromol/kg), and gadolinium-enhanced(0.1 mmol/kg) imaging within 2 weeks. RESULTS: A significant (P< .05) difference in percentage signal intensity loss (PSIL) was seen in benign tumors on AMI-25-enhanced proton-density-weighted images (nine focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH], 41%; one adenoma, 32.4%) versus malignant tumors. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo images showed strong enhancement in benign lesions (seven FNH, 147.5%; one adenoma, 91.3%) and moderate enhancement in malignant tumors (eight hepatocellular carcinomas, 116.2%, 11 metastases, 39.7%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a threshold PSIL of 10% on AMI-25-enhanced images as the most essential criteria to distinguish benign from malignant lesions (sensitivity, 88%; specificity. 89%). Interobserver analysis for two observers revealed specificity of 93% for AMI-25-enhanced imaging versus 81.5% for gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. CONCLUSION: AMI-25 decreased the SI of benign tumors and helped differentiate benign from malignant tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate experimentally and clinically an internally cooled power laser system for percutaneous treatment of liver metastases, with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging guidance, to increase the volume of coagulative necrosis with single laser beam applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The power laser system consisted of standard cannulation paraphernalia and a specially designed 7-F protective catheter for cooling the laser tip during treatment to avoid carbonization. A microdome laser beam applicator with a laser tip diameter of 0.95 mm kept the entire device as small as possible. After the unit was tested in 40 porcine livers, 532 laser beam applications (mean power, 27.5 W [range, 22.1-30.0 W]; mean application time, 19.8 minutes [range, 14-30 minutes]) were performed with MR guidance in 127 patients with 318 liver metastases. The safety of the procedure and the volume of induced necrosis were evaluated. RESULTS: In vitro, cuboid areas of coagulative necrosis with a mean greatest diameter of 4.3 cm +/- 0.5 (SD) were demonstrated after single applications. In vivo, MR thermometry allowed accurate demarcation of changes induced by heat, with a mean diameter of necrosis of 3.3 cm +/- 1.4. No carbonization or vaporization of tissue or damage of equipment occurred during treatment. CONCLUSION: This power laser system can increase the volume of laser-induced necrosis in liver metastases with a single application, thereby simplifying and accelerating the treatment of larger lesions.