W

W. Schwarz

Department of the Premier and Cabinet

Publishes on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis, Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies, X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography. 133 papers and 2.5k citations.

133Publications
2.5kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Cited by 454

PURPOSE: To compare the usefulness of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with focal liver lesions underwent T2- and T1-weighted spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fast low-angle shot two-dimensional MR imaging before, during, and after intravenous administration of three different doses of Gd-EOB-DTPA (12.5, 25, and 50 mumol per kilogram body weight). Gd-DTPA-enhanced imaging (dose, 0.1 mmol per kilogram body weight) was performed in the same patients within 1 week of Gd-EOB-DTPA imaging. RESULTS: During the perfusion phase (the 3 minutes after injection of contrast material), the dynamic enhancement characteristics seen after injection of 25 and 50 mumol of Gd-EOB-DTPA were similar to those seen with Gd-DTPA. At the lowest dose of Gd-EOB-DTPA (12.5 mumol), the dynamic enhancement characteristics were not comparable to those seen with Gd-DTPA. During the hepatobiliary phase (1.5 minutes to 4 hours after injection), Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced images yielded a dose-independent, statistically significant improvement in the detection rate of additional metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas compared with unenhanced and Gd-DTPA-enhanced images (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging enables improved detection of hepatic lesions over Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging while providing comparable differential diagnostic information.

Superparamagnetic iron oxide--enhanced versus gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging for differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions.
Thomas J. Vogl, R Hammerstingl, W. Schwarz et al.|Radiology|1996
Cited by 188

PURPOSE: To assess AMI-25- versus gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differential diagnosis of liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with liver tumors underwent unenhanced, AMI-25-enhanced (15 micromol/kg), and gadolinium-enhanced(0.1 mmol/kg) imaging within 2 weeks. RESULTS: A significant (P< .05) difference in percentage signal intensity loss (PSIL) was seen in benign tumors on AMI-25-enhanced proton-density-weighted images (nine focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH], 41%; one adenoma, 32.4%) versus malignant tumors. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo images showed strong enhancement in benign lesions (seven FNH, 147.5%; one adenoma, 91.3%) and moderate enhancement in malignant tumors (eight hepatocellular carcinomas, 116.2%, 11 metastases, 39.7%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a threshold PSIL of 10% on AMI-25-enhanced images as the most essential criteria to distinguish benign from malignant lesions (sensitivity, 88%; specificity. 89%). Interobserver analysis for two observers revealed specificity of 93% for AMI-25-enhanced imaging versus 81.5% for gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. CONCLUSION: AMI-25 decreased the SI of benign tumors and helped differentiate benign from malignant tumors.