Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?Jürgen Höher, H. D. Möller, Freddie H. Fu|Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy|1998 Radiographic enlargement of bone tunnels following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been recently introduced in the literature; however, the etiology and clinical relevance of this phenomenon remain unclear. While early reports suggested that bone tunnel enlargement is mainly the result of an immune response to allograft tissue, more recent studies imply that other biological as well as mechanical factors play a more important role. Biological factors associated with tunnel enlargement include foreign-body immune response (against allografts), non-specific inflammatory response (as in osteolysis around total joint implants), cell necrosis due to toxic products in the tunnel (ethylene oxide, metal), and heat necrosis as a response to drilling (natural course). Mechanical factors contributing to tunnel enlargement include stress deprivation of bone within the tunnel wall, graft-tunnel motion, improper tunnel placement, and aggressive rehabilitation. Graft-tunnel motion refers to longitudinal and transverse motion of the graft within the bone tunnel and can occur with various graft types and fixation techniques. Aggressive rehabilitation programmes may contribute to tunnel enlargement as the graft-bone interface is subjected to early stress before biological incorporation is complete. Further basic research is required to verify the effect of the various proposed factors on the etiology of bone tunnel enlargement. We recommend that routine follow-up examinations after ACL reconstruction should include the measurement of bone tunnel size in order to contribute to a better understanding of the incidence, time course, and clinical relevance of this phenomenon. Improved and more anatomical surgical fixation techniques may be useful for the prevention of bone tunnel enlargement.
Biomechanical Analysis of a Posterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionChristopher D. Harner, Tracy M. Vogrin, Jürgen Höher et al.|The American Journal of Sports Medicine|2000 We hypothesized that posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are often compromised by associated injuries to the posterolateral structures. Therefore, we evaluated a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in isolated and combined injury models using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The resulting knee kinematics and the in situ forces in the native and reconstructed posterior cruciate ligament were determined under four external loading conditions. In the isolated injury model, reconstruction reduced posterior tibial translation to within 1.5+/-1.3 to 2.4+/-1.4 mm of the intact knee at 30 degrees and 90 degrees under a 134-N posterior tibial load. In the combined injury model, deficiency of the posterolateral structures increased posterior tibial translation of the reconstructed knee by 6.0+/-2.7 mm at 30 degrees and 4.6+/-1.5 mm at 90 degrees of flexion. External rotation increased up to 14 degrees while varus rotation increased up to 7 degrees. In situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament graft also increased significantly (by 22% to 150%) for all loading conditions. Our results demonstrate that a graft that restores knee kinematics for an isolated posterior cruciate ligament deficiency is rendered ineffective and may be overloaded if the posterolateral structures are deficient. Therefore, surgical reconstruction of both structures is recommended in the setting of a combined injury.
Evaluation and Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesChristopher D. Harner, Jürgen Höher|The American Journal of Sports Medicine|1998 Improved basic science data on the anatomy and biomechanics of the human posterior cruciate ligament have provided the orthopaedic surgeon with new information on which to base treatment decisions. Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament are reported to comprise approximately 3% of all knee ligament injuries in the general population and as high as 37% in an emergency department setting. While the diagnosis of a posterior cruciate ligament injury can often be made with a physical examination, ancillary studies such as radiographs and magnetic resonance images can be very helpful in detecting associated ligament and bony injuries. In general, most partial (grades I and II) posterior cruciate ligament injuries can be treated nonoperatively. However, surgical reconstruction is usually recommended for those posterior cruciate ligament injuries that occur in combination with other structures. In this review, current surgical techniques of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on anatomic and biomechanical studies will be discussed.
Hamstring graft motion in the femoral bone tunnel when using titanium button/ polyester tape fixationJürgen Höher, Glen A. Livesay, C. Benjamin et al.|Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy|1999 The objective of this study was to determine the relative motion of a quadruple hamstring graft within the femoral bone tunnel (graft-tunnel motion) under tensile loading. Six graft constructs were prepared from the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons of human cadavers and were fixed with a titanium button and polyester tape within a bone tunnel in a cadaveric femur. Three different lengths of polyester tape (15, 25, and 35 mm loops) were evaluated. The femur was held stationary and uniaxial tensile loads were applied to the distal end of the graft using a materials testing machine. Each construct was subjected to loading for ten cycles with upper limits of 50 N, 100 N, 200 N and 300 N. Graft-tunnel motion was then determined using the distances between reflective tape markers placed on the hamstring graft and at the entrance to the femoral bone tunnel, which were tracked with a high-resolution video system. Graft-tunnel motion was found to range from 0.7 +/- 0.2 mm to 3.3 +/- 0.2 mm, and significant increases in graft-tunnel motion were observed with increasing tensile loads (P < 0.05). Shorter tape length (15 mm) resulted in significantly less motion when compared to longer tape length (35 mm) (P < 0.05). We conclude that graft-tunnel motion is significant and should be considered when using this fixation technique. Early stress on the graft, as seen in postoperative rehabilitation exercises and athletic activities, may cause large graft-tunnel motion before graft incorporation is complete. A shorter distance between the tendon tissue and the titanium button is recommended to minimize the amount of graft-tunnel motion. Alternative fixation materials to polyester tape, or different fixation techniques, need to be developed such that graft-tunnel motion can be reduced. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of graft-tunnel motion on graft incorporation in the bone tunnel.
Altered Landing Mechanics in ACL-Reconstructed PatientsKai Daniel Oberländer, Gert‐Peter Brüggemann, Jürgen Höher et al.|Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise|2013 PURPOSE: This longitudinal study aimed to examine whether patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction show a similar landing strategy during the single-leg hop test (SLHT) postsurgery analog to that previously identified when ACL deficient. It is hypothesized that ACL-reconstructed patients demonstrate greater trunk flexion to reduce knee joint moments at the cost of postural dynamic stability at their involved leg compared to their uninvolved leg. METHODS: Ten ACL-reconstructed patients performed a bilateral SLHT 6 and 12 months after surgery. Landing mechanics were determined by means of a soft tissue artifact optimized, rigid, full-body model, and the margin of stability was quantified using an inverted pendulum approach. Knee extensor muscular strength (KS) was assessed during isometric maximal voluntary knee extension contractions. RESULTS: ACL-reconstructed patients showed similar landing strategies as previously reported in their ACL-deficient state. By flexing their trunk, patients repositioned the ground reaction force vector more anteriorly in relation to the joints of the lower extremity (P < 0.05) and, in doing so, were able to transfer joint moments from the knee to the adjacent joints (P < 0.05). This upper body strategy reduced the margin of stability in the ACL-reconstructed leg during landing (P < 0.05). Twelve months after surgery, the ACL-reconstructed leg showed lower KS compared to the uninvolved leg (P < 0.05), and knee joint moment output during landing was significantly correlated to KS. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the important role of KS on the interaction between trunk angle, joint kinetics, and postural dynamic stability during landing and show that ACL-reconstructed patients use an analogous feedforward strategy (e.g., more flexed trunk) to that used in their ACL-deficient state, aiming to compensate for KS deficits and thereby sacrificing postural dynamic stability and increasing the risk of loss of balance during landing maneuvers.