Biomechanical Analysis of a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Christopher D. Harner(University of Pittsburgh), Tracy M. Vogrin(University of Pittsburgh), Jürgen Höher(University of Pittsburgh), C. Benjamin(University of Pittsburgh), Savio L‐Y. Woo(University of Pittsburgh)
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
January 1, 2000
Cited by 361

Abstract

We hypothesized that posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are often compromised by associated injuries to the posterolateral structures. Therefore, we evaluated a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in isolated and combined injury models using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The resulting knee kinematics and the in situ forces in the native and reconstructed posterior cruciate ligament were determined under four external loading conditions. In the isolated injury model, reconstruction reduced posterior tibial translation to within 1.5+/-1.3 to 2.4+/-1.4 mm of the intact knee at 30 degrees and 90 degrees under a 134-N posterior tibial load. In the combined injury model, deficiency of the posterolateral structures increased posterior tibial translation of the reconstructed knee by 6.0+/-2.7 mm at 30 degrees and 4.6+/-1.5 mm at 90 degrees of flexion. External rotation increased up to 14 degrees while varus rotation increased up to 7 degrees. In situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament graft also increased significantly (by 22% to 150%) for all loading conditions. Our results demonstrate that a graft that restores knee kinematics for an isolated posterior cruciate ligament deficiency is rendered ineffective and may be overloaded if the posterolateral structures are deficient. Therefore, surgical reconstruction of both structures is recommended in the setting of a combined injury.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis