Sandeep Kumar

Site-directed nucleases (SDNs) used for targeted genome editing are powerful new tools to introduce precise genetic changes into plants. Like traditional approaches, such as conventional crossing and induced mutagenesis, genome editing aims to improve crop yield and nutrition. Next-generation sequencing studies demonstrate that across their genomes, populations of crop species typically carry millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms and many copy number and structural variants. Spontaneous mutations occur at rates of ;10 28 to 10 29 per site per generation, while variation induced by chemical treatment or ionizing radiation results in higher mutation rates. In the context of SDNs, an off-target change or edit is an unintended, nonspecific mutation occurring at a site with sequence similarity to the targeted edit region. SDN-mediated offtarget changes can contribute to a small number of additional genetic variants compared to those that occur naturally in breeding populations or are introduced by induced-mutagenesis methods. Recent studies show that using computational algorithms to design genome editing reagents can mitigate off-target edits in plants. Finally, crops are subject to strong selection to eliminate off-type plants through well-established multigenerational breeding, selection, and commercial variety development practices. Within this context, off-target edits in crops present no new safety concerns compared to other breeding practices. The current generation of genome editing technologies is already proving useful to develop new plant varieties with consumer and farmer benefits. Genome editing will likely undergo improved editing specificity along with new developments in SDN delivery and increasing genomic characterization, further improving reagent design and application.

CRISPR-Cas9 enabled genome engineering has great potential for improving agriculture productivity, but the possibility of unintended off-target edits has evoked some concerns. Here we employ a three-step strategy to investigate Cas9 nuclease specificity in a complex plant genome. Our approach pairs computational prediction with genome-wide biochemical off-target detection followed by validation in maize plants. Our results reveal high frequency (up to 90%) on-target editing with no evidence of off-target cleavage activity when guide RNAs were bioinformatically predicted to be specific. Predictable off-target edits were observed but only with a promiscuous guide RNA intentionally designed to validate our approach. Off-target editing can be minimized by designing guide RNAs that are different from other genomic locations by at least three mismatches in combination with at least one mismatch occurring in the PAM proximal region. With well-designed guides, genetic variation from Cas9 off-target cleavage in plants is negligible, and much less than inherent variation.

To obtain insight into the mechanism of transferred DNA (T-DNA) integration in a long-lived tree system, we analysed 30 transgenic aspen lines. In total, 27 right T-DNA/plant junctions, 20 left T-DNA/plant junctions, and 10 target insertions from control plants were obtained. At the right end, the T-DNA was conserved up to the cleavage site in 18 transgenic lines (67%), and the right border repeat was deleted in nine junctions. Nucleotides from the left border repeat were present in 19 transgenic lines out of 20 cases analysed. However, only four (20%) of the left border ends were conserved to the processing end, indicating that the T-DNA left and right ends are treated mechanistically differently during the T-DNA integration process. Comparison of the genomic target sites prior to integration to the T-DNA revealed that the T-DNA inserted into the plant genome without any notable deletion of genomic sequence in three out of 10 transgenic lines analysed. However, deletions of DNA ranging in length from a few nucleotides to more than 500 bp were observed in other transgenic lines. Filler DNAs of up to 235 bp were observed on left and/or right junctions of six transgenic lines, which in most cases originated from the nearby host genomic sequence or from the T-DNA. Short sequence similarities between recombining strands near break points, in particular for the left T-DNA end, were observed in most of the lines analysed. These results confirm the well-accepted T-DNA integration model based on single-stranded annealing followed by ligation of the right border which is preserved by the VirD2 protein. However, a second category of T-DNA integration was also identified in nine transgenic lines, in which the right border of the T-DNA was partly truncated. Such integration events are described via a model for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks in somatic plant cells based on synthesis-dependent strand-annealing. This report in a long-lived tree system provides major insight into the mechanism of transgene integration.