CRISPR-Cas9 Editing in Maize: Systematic Evaluation of Off-target Activity and Its Relevance in Crop Improvement

Joshua K. Young(Corteva (United States)), Gina Zastrow‐Hayes(Corteva (United States)), Stéphane Deschamps(Corteva (United States)), Sergei Svitashev(Corteva (United States)), Mindaugas Zaremba(Vilnius University), Ananta Acharya(Corteva (United States)), Sushmitha Paulraj(Corteva (United States)), Brooke Peterson-Burch(Corteva (United States)), Chris Schwartz(Corteva (United States)), Vesna Djukanovic(Corteva (United States)), Brian Lenderts(Corteva (United States)), Lanie Feigenbutz(Corteva (United States)), Lijuan Wang(Corteva (United States)), Clara M. Alarcón(Corteva (United States)), Virginijus Šikšnys(Vilnius University), Gregory D. May(Corteva (United States)), N. Doane Chilcoat(Corteva (United States)), Sandeep Kumar(Corteva (United States))
Scientific Reports
April 30, 2019
Cited by 97Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 enabled genome engineering has great potential for improving agriculture productivity, but the possibility of unintended off-target edits has evoked some concerns. Here we employ a three-step strategy to investigate Cas9 nuclease specificity in a complex plant genome. Our approach pairs computational prediction with genome-wide biochemical off-target detection followed by validation in maize plants. Our results reveal high frequency (up to 90%) on-target editing with no evidence of off-target cleavage activity when guide RNAs were bioinformatically predicted to be specific. Predictable off-target edits were observed but only with a promiscuous guide RNA intentionally designed to validate our approach. Off-target editing can be minimized by designing guide RNAs that are different from other genomic locations by at least three mismatches in combination with at least one mismatch occurring in the PAM proximal region. With well-designed guides, genetic variation from Cas9 off-target cleavage in plants is negligible, and much less than inherent variation.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis