Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer: Variation in Risk with Rare Deleterious or Predicted Deleterious Variants in DNA Repair Genes

Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra(Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora), Marie‐Gabrielle Dondon(Inserm), Séverine Eon‐Marchais(Inserm), Dorothée Le Gal(Inserm), Juana Beauvallet(Inserm), Noura Mebirouk(Inserm), Muriel Belotti(Institut Curie), Eve Cavaciuti(Inserm), Claude Adenis-Lavignasse, Séverine Audebert‐Bellanger(Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest), Pascaline Berthet(Centre François Baclesse), Valérie Bonadona(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Bruno Buecher(Institut Curie), Olivier Caron(Institut Gustave Roussy), Mathias Cavaillé(Inserm), Jean Chiésa(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes), Chrystelle Colas(Hôpital René Huguenin), Isabelle Coupier(Inserm), Capucine Delnatte(Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest), Hélène Dreyfus(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble), Anne Fajac(Sorbonne Université), Sandra Fert‐Ferrer(Centre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie), Jean‐Pierre Fricker, Marion Gauthier‐Villars(Institut Curie), Paul Gesta, Sophie Giraud(Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque), Laurence Gladieff(Institut Claudius Regaud), Christine Lasset(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Sophie Lejeune‐Dumoulin(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille), Jean‐Marc Limacher(Hôpital Pasteur), Michel Longy(Université de Bordeaux), Alain Lortholary, Élisabeth Luporsi(Centre Hospitalier Régional de Metz-Thionville), Christine M. Maugard(Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg), Isabelle Mortemousque(Hôpital Bretonneau), Sophie Nambot(Centre Georges François Leclerc), Catherine Noguès(Inserm), Pascal Pujol(Inserm), Laurence Venat‐Bouvet(Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren), Florent Soubrier(Sorbonne Université), Julie Tinat, A. Tardivon(Institut Curie), Fabienne Lesueur(Inserm), Dominique Stoppa‐Lyonnet(Inserm), Nadine Andrieu(Inserm)
Cancers
March 21, 2025
Cited by 0Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Background: Women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer (BC) are offered screening at earlier ages and more frequently than women from the general population. Methods: We evaluated the effect of screening mammography in 1552 BC cases with a hereditary predisposition to BC unexplained by BRCA1 or BRCA2 and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their lifetime mammography exposures in a detailed questionnaire. Germline rare deleterious or predicted deleterious variants (D-PDVs) in 113 DNA repair genes were investigated in 82.5% of the women and classified according to the strength of their association with BC. Genes with an odds ratio (OR) < 0.9 was assigned to the Gene Group “Reduced”, those with OR ≥ 0.9 and ≤1.1 to Group “Independent”, and those with OR > 1.1 to Group “Increased”. Results: Overall, having been exposed to mammograms (never vs. ever) was not associated with BC risk. However, an increase in BC risk of 4% (95% CI: 1–6%) per additional exposure was found under the assumption of linearity. When grouped according to D-PDV carrier status, mammograms doubled the BC risk of women carrying a D-PDV in Group “Reduced”, as compared to those carrying a D-PDV in Group “Increased”. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the joint effect of mammogram exposure and variants in DNA repair genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women at high risk of BC; therefore, further studies are needed to verify our findings. Even though mammographic screening reduces the risk of mortality from BC, the identification of populations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation may be clinically relevant.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis