F

Florent Soubrier

Sorbonne Université

Publishes on Renin-Angiotensin System Studies, Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension, BRCA gene mutations in cancer. 6 papers and 2.2k citations.

6Publications
2.2kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

The genetic basis of hypertension
Florent Soubrier, G.M. Lathrop|Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension|1995
Cited by 29

Genetic approaches are setting the stage for a new understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying blood pressure regulation and hypertension. Recently, substantial progress has been made in elucidating the molecular mechanisms that cause several rare forms of hypertension, including hypertension arising from mutations in the 11 beta-hydroxylase gene, Liddle's syndrome, and glucocorticoid-suppressible aldosteronism. New results have been obtained on the possible role of the angiotensinogen gene, and other candidate genes, such as the angiotensin II receptor Type I gene and the Sa gene, in human hypertension. Investigation of experimental models of hereditary hypertension have also been important in unravelling the genetic complexity of the disease.

Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer: Variation in Risk with Rare Deleterious or Predicted Deleterious Variants in DNA Repair Genes
Cited by 0Open Access

Background: Women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer (BC) are offered screening at earlier ages and more frequently than women from the general population. Methods: We evaluated the effect of screening mammography in 1552 BC cases with a hereditary predisposition to BC unexplained by BRCA1 or BRCA2 and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their lifetime mammography exposures in a detailed questionnaire. Germline rare deleterious or predicted deleterious variants (D-PDVs) in 113 DNA repair genes were investigated in 82.5% of the women and classified according to the strength of their association with BC. Genes with an odds ratio (OR) < 0.9 was assigned to the Gene Group “Reduced”, those with OR ≥ 0.9 and ≤1.1 to Group “Independent”, and those with OR > 1.1 to Group “Increased”. Results: Overall, having been exposed to mammograms (never vs. ever) was not associated with BC risk. However, an increase in BC risk of 4% (95% CI: 1–6%) per additional exposure was found under the assumption of linearity. When grouped according to D-PDV carrier status, mammograms doubled the BC risk of women carrying a D-PDV in Group “Reduced”, as compared to those carrying a D-PDV in Group “Increased”. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the joint effect of mammogram exposure and variants in DNA repair genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women at high risk of BC; therefore, further studies are needed to verify our findings. Even though mammographic screening reduces the risk of mortality from BC, the identification of populations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation may be clinically relevant.