Belzutifan versus Everolimus for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Toni K. Choueiri(Cancer Research UK), Thomas Powles(Cancer Research UK), Katriina Peltola(Cancer Research UK), Guillermo de Velasco(Cancer Research UK), Mauricio Burotto(Cancer Research UK), Cristina Suárez(Cancer Research UK), Pooja Ghatalia(Cancer Research UK), Roberto Iacovelli(Cancer Research UK), Elaine T. Lam(Cancer Research UK), Elena Verzoni(Cancer Research UK), Mahmut Gümüş(Cancer Research UK), Walter M. Stadler(Cancer Research UK), Christian Kollmannsberger(Cancer Research UK), Bohuslav Melichar(Cancer Research UK), Balaji Venugopal(Cancer Research UK), Marine Gross‐Goupil(Cancer Research UK), Alexandr Poprach(Cancer Research UK), Maria De Santis(Cancer Research UK), Fabio A. Schutz(Cancer Research UK), Se Hoon Park(Cancer Research UK), Dmitry Nosov(Cancer Research UK), Camillo Porta(Cancer Research UK), Jae‐Lyun Lee(Cancer Research UK), Xavier García del Muro(Cancer Research UK), Elisa Biscaldi(Cancer Research UK), Ray Manneh Kopp(Cancer Research UK), Mototsugu Oya(Cancer Research UK), He Li(Cancer Research UK), Aobo Wang(Cancer Research UK), Rodolfo F. Perini(Cancer Research UK), Donna Vickery(Cancer Research UK), Laurence Albigès(Cancer Research UK), Brian I. Rini(Cancer Research UK)
New England Journal of Medicine
August 22, 2024
Cited by 136

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2α inhibitor, showed clinical activity in clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma in early-phase studies. METHODS: In a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled trial, we enrolled participants with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had previously received immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic therapies and randomly assigned them, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive 120 mg of belzutifan or 10 mg of everolimus orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. The dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. The key secondary end point was the occurrence of an objective response (a confirmed complete or partial response). RESULTS: A total of 374 participants were assigned to belzutifan, and 372 to everolimus. At the first interim analysis (median follow-up, 18.4 months), the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in both groups; at 18 months, 24.0% of the participants in the belzutifan group and 8.3% in the everolimus group were alive and free of progression (two-sided P = 0.002, which met the prespecified significance criterion). A confirmed objective response occurred in 21.9% of the participants (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.8 to 26.5) in the belzutifan group and in 3.5% (95% CI, 1.9 to 5.9) in the everolimus group (P<0.001, which met the prespecified significance criterion). At the second interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.7 months), the median overall survival was 21.4 months in the belzutifan group and 18.1 months in the everolimus group; at 18 months, 55.2% and 50.6% of the participants, respectively, were alive (hazard ratio for death, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.07; two-sided P = 0.20, which did not meet the prespecified significance criterion). Grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 61.8% of the participants in the belzutifan group (grade 5 in 3.5%) and in 62.5% in the everolimus group (grade 5 in 5.3%). Adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in 5.9% and 14.7% of the participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Belzutifan showed a significant benefit over everolimus with respect to progression-free survival and objective response in participants with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had previously received immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic therapies. Belzutifan was associated with no new safety signals. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; LITESPARK-005 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04195750.).


Related Papers