Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Brian I. Rini(Cleveland Clinic), Elizabeth R. Plimack(Fox Chase Cancer Center), V.P. Stus(Ministry of Health), Rustem Gafanov(Federal State Budgetary Institution Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology), Robert D. Hawkins(The Christie NHS Foundation Trust), Dmitry Nosov(Central Clinical Hospital and Polyclinic), Frédéric Pouliot(Université Laval), B. Yа. Alekseev(P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute), Denis Soulières(Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Bohuslav Melichar(Palacký University Olomouc), Ihor Vynnychenko(Sumy State University), Anna Kryzhanivska(Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University), Igor Bondarenko(Dnipro State Medical University), Sérgio Jobim Azevedo(Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre), Delphine Borchiellini(Université Côte d'Azur), Cezary Szczylik(Wojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej), Maurice Markus(Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers), Raymond S. McDermott(University College Dublin), Jens Bedke(University of Tübingen), Sophie Tartas(Lyon College), Yen‐Hwa Chang(Taipei Veterans General Hospital), Satoshi Tamada(Osaka City University Hospital), Qiong Shou(Dnipro State Medical University), Rodolfo F. Perini(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Mei Chen(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Michael B. Atkins(Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center), Thomas Powles(Queen Mary University of London)
New England Journal of Medicine
February 16, 2019
Cited by 3,379Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of pembrolizumab and axitinib showed antitumor activity in a phase 1b trial involving patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. Whether pembrolizumab plus axitinib would result in better outcomes than sunitinib in such patients was unclear. METHODS: In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 861 patients with previously untreated advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma to receive pembrolizumab (200 mg) intravenously once every 3 weeks plus axitinib (5 mg) orally twice daily (432 patients) or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for the first 4 weeks of each 6-week cycle (429 patients). The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The key secondary end point was the objective response rate. All reported results are from the protocol-specified first interim analysis. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12.8 months, the estimated percentage of patients who were alive at 12 months was 89.9% in the pembrolizumab-axitinib group and 78.3% in the sunitinib group (hazard ratio for death, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.74; P<0.0001). Median progression-free survival was 15.1 months in the pembrolizumab-axitinib group and 11.1 months in the sunitinib group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.84; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 59.3% (95% CI, 54.5 to 63.9) in the pembrolizumab-axitinib group and 35.7% (95% CI, 31.1 to 40.4) in the sunitinib group (P<0.001). The benefit of pembrolizumab plus axitinib was observed across the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk groups (i.e., favorable, intermediate, and poor risk) and regardless of programmed death ligand 1 expression. Grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 75.8% of patients in the pembrolizumab-axitinib group and in 70.6% in the sunitinib group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma, treatment with pembrolizumab plus axitinib resulted in significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival, as well as a higher objective response rate, than treatment with sunitinib. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme; KEYNOTE-426 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02853331.).


Related Papers