Insulin therapy and blood glucose management in critically ill patients: a 1-day cross-sectional observational study in 69 French intensive care units

Maxime Desgrouas(Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans), Julien Demiselle(Inserm), Laure Stiel(Inserm), Vincent Brunot(Université de Montpellier), Rémy Marnai(Centre Hospitalier du Mans), Sacha Sarfati(Normandie Université), Maud Fiancette(Roche (France)), Fabien Lambiotte(Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes), Arnaud W. Thille(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers), Maxime Leloup(Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle), Sébastien Clerc(Sorbonne Université), Pascal Beuret, Anne-Astrid Bourion(Centre Hospitalier de Lens), Johan Daum(Centre hospitalier Robert-Ballanger), Rémi Malhomme(Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre), Ramin Ravan(Institut Européen De La Qualité Totale), Bertrand Sauneuf(Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin), Jean‐Philippe Rigaud(Centre Médical de La Teppe), Pierre‐François Dequin(Université de Tours), Thierry Boulain(Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans)
Annals of Intensive Care
January 1, 2023
Cited by 7Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycaemia is common in critically ill patients, but blood glucose and insulin management may differ widely among intensive care units (ICUs). We aimed to describe insulin use practices and the resulting glycaemic control in French ICUs. We conducted a multicentre 1-day observational study on November 23, 2021, in 69 French ICUs. Adult patients hospitalized for an acute organ failure, severe infection or post-operative care were included. Data were recorded from midnight to 11:59 p.m. the day of the study by 4-h periods. RESULTS: Two ICUs declared to have no insulin protocol. There was a wide disparity in blood glucose targets between ICUs with 35 different target ranges recorded. In 893 included patients we collected 4823 blood glucose values whose distribution varied significantly across ICUs (P < 0.0001). We observed 1135 hyperglycaemias (> 1.8 g/L) in 402 (45.0%) patients, 35 hypoglycaemias (≤ 0.7 g/L) in 26 (2.9%) patients, and one instance of severe hypoglycaemia (≤ 0.4 g/L). Four hundred eight (45.7%) patients received either IV insulin (255 [62.5%]), subcutaneous (SC) insulin (126 [30.9%]), or both (27 [6.6%]). Among patients under protocolized intravenous (IV) insulin, 767/1681 (45.6%) of glycaemias were above the target range. Among patients receiving insulin, short- and long-acting SC insulin use were associated with higher counts of hyperglycaemias as assessed by multivariable negative binomial regression adjusted for the propensity to receive SC insulin: incidence rate ratio of 3.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.97-4.00) (P < 0.0001) and 3.58 (95% CI 2.84-4.52) (P < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Practices regarding blood glucose management varied widely among French ICUs. Administration of short or long-acting SC insulin was not unusual and associated with more frequent hyperglycaemia. The protocolized insulin algorithms used failed to prevent hyperglycaemic events.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis