High-Flow Oxygen through Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

J. P. Frat(Apple (Israel)), Arnaud W. Thille(Inserm), Alain Mercat(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers), Christophe Girault(Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation), Stéphanie Ragot(Inserm), Sébastien Perbet, Gwénaël Prat, Thierry Boulain(Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans), Élise Morawiec(Sorbonne Université), Alice Cottereau(Roche (France)), Jérôme Devaquet(Hôpital Foch), Saad Nseir(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille), Keyvan Razazi(Inserm), Jean‐Paul Mira(Université Paris Cité), Laurent Argaud(Hospices Civils de Lyon), Jean-Charles Chakarian, Jean-Damien Ricard(Inserm), Xavier Wittebole(Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc), Stéphanie Chevalier(Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Malo), Alexandre Herbland(Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle), Muriel Fartoukh(Sorbonne Université), Jean‐Michel Constantin, Jean-Marie Tonnelier, Marc Pierrot(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers), Armelle Mathonnet(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers), G. Béduneau(Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation), Céline Deletage-Métreau, Jean-Christophe M. Richard(Inserm), Laurent Brochard(St. Michael's Hospital), R. Robert(Inserm)
New England Journal of Medicine
May 17, 2015
Cited by 2,338Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether noninvasive ventilation should be administered in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is debated. Therapy with high-flow oxygen through a nasal cannula may offer an alternative in patients with hypoxemia. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, open-label trial in which we randomly assigned patients without hypercapnia who had acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen of 300 mm Hg or less to high-flow oxygen therapy, standard oxygen therapy delivered through a face mask, or noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients intubated at day 28; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality in the intensive care unit and at 90 days and the number of ventilator-free days at day 28. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients were included in the analyses. The intubation rate (primary outcome) was 38% (40 of 106 patients) in the high-flow-oxygen group, 47% (44 of 94) in the standard group, and 50% (55 of 110) in the noninvasive-ventilation group (P=0.18 for all comparisons). The number of ventilator-free days at day 28 was significantly higher in the high-flow-oxygen group (24±8 days, vs. 22±10 in the standard-oxygen group and 19±12 in the noninvasive-ventilation group; P=0.02 for all comparisons). The hazard ratio for death at 90 days was 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 3.99) with standard oxygen versus high-flow oxygen (P=0.046) and 2.50 (95% CI, 1.31 to 4.78) with noninvasive ventilation versus high-flow oxygen (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonhypercapnic acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, treatment with high-flow oxygen, standard oxygen, or noninvasive ventilation did not result in significantly different intubation rates. There was a significant difference in favor of high-flow oxygen in 90-day mortality. (Funded by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique Interrégional 2010 of the French Ministry of Health; FLORALI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01320384.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis