Capivasertib in Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

Nicholas C. Turner(Cancer Research UK), Mafalda Oliveira(Hebron University), Sacha J. Howell(Cancer Research UK), Florence Dalenc(Cancer Research UK), Javier Cortés(Cancer Research UK), Henry Gómez(Cancer Research UK), Xichun Hu(Cancer Research UK), Komal Jhaveri(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Petr Krivorotko(Cancer Research UK), Sibylle Loibl(Cancer Research UK), Serafin Morales Murillo(Cancer Research UK), Meena Okera(Cancer Research UK), Yeon Hee Park(Cancer Research UK), Joohyuk Sohn(Yonsei University), Masakazu Toi(Cancer Research UK), Eriko Tokunaga(Cancer Research UK), Samih Yousef(Emek Medical Center), Lyudmila Zhukova(Cancer Research UK), Elza C. de Bruin(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Lynda Grinsted(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Gaia Schiavon(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Andrew Foxley(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Hope S. Rugo(University of California, San Francisco)
New England Journal of Medicine
May 31, 2023
Cited by 686Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

AKT pathway activation is implicated in endocrine-therapy resistance. Data on the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, as an addition to fulvestrant therapy, in patients with hormone receptor–positive advanced breast cancer are limited. Download a PDF of the Research Summary. In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled eligible pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women and men with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer who had had a relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. The dual primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with AKT pathway–altered (PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN) tumors. Safety was assessed. Overall, 708 patients underwent randomization; 289 patients (40.8%) had AKT pathway alterations, and 489 (69.1%) had received a CDK4/6 inhibitor previously for advanced breast cancer. In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the capivasertib–fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.6 months in the placebo–fulvestrant group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.71; P<0.001). In the AKT pathway–altered population, the median progression-free survival was 7.3 months in the capivasertib–fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.1 months in the placebo–fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or higher in patients receiving capivasertib–fulvestrant were rash (in 12.1% of patients, vs. in 0.3% of those receiving placebo–fulvestrant) and diarrhea (in 9.3% vs. 0.3%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in 13.0% of the patients receiving capivasertib and in 2.3% of those receiving placebo. Capivasertib–fulvestrant therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor–positive advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed during or after previous aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor. (Funded by AstraZeneca and the National Cancer Institute; CAPItello-291 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04305496.) QUICK TAKE VIDEO SUMMARYCapivasertib in Advanced Breast Cancer 02:14


Related Papers