Everolimus in Postmenopausal Hormone-Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

José Baselga(Harvard University), Mario Campone(Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest), Martine Piccart(Institut Jules Bordet), Howard A. Burris, Hope S. Rugo(University of California, San Francisco), Tarek Sahmoud(Novartis (United States)), Shinzaburo Noguchi(The University of Osaka), Michael Gnant(Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna), Kathleen I. Pritchard(Sunnybrook Health Science Centre), Fabienne Lebrun(Institut Jules Bordet), J. Thaddeus Beck(Highlands Oncology Group), Yoshinori Ito(Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research), Denise A. Yardley(Sarah Cannon Research Institute), Ines Deleu(Vlaamse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecolo), Alejandra Perez(Memorial Healthcare System), Thomas Bachelot(Centre Léon Bérard), Luc Vittori(Novartis (Switzerland)), Zhiying Xu(Novartis (United States)), Pabak Mukhopadhyay(Novartis (United States)), David Lebwohl(Novartis (United States)), Gabriel N. Hortobágyi(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
New England Journal of Medicine
December 7, 2011
Cited by 2,826Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer is associated with activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) intracellular signaling pathway. In early studies, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus added to endocrine therapy showed antitumor activity. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized trial, we compared everolimus and exemestane versus exemestane and placebo (randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio) in 724 patients with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who had recurrence or progression while receiving previous therapy with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant setting or to treat advanced disease (or both). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included survival, response rate, and safety. A preplanned interim analysis was performed by an independent data and safety monitoring committee after 359 progression-free survival events were observed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two study groups. The median age was 62 years, 56% had visceral involvement, and 84% had hormone-sensitive disease. Previous therapy included letrozole or anastrozole (100%), tamoxifen (48%), fulvestrant (16%), and chemotherapy (68%). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were stomatitis (8% in the everolimus-plus-exemestane group vs. 1% in the placebo-plus-exemestane group), anemia (6% vs. <1%), dyspnea (4% vs. 1%), hyperglycemia (4% vs. <1%), fatigue (4% vs. 1%), and pneumonitis (3% vs. 0%). At the interim analysis, median progression-free survival was 6.9 months with everolimus plus exemestane and 2.8 months with placebo plus exemestane, according to assessments by local investigators (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.54; P<0.001). Median progression-free survival was 10.6 months and 4.1 months, respectively, according to central assessment (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.47; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus combined with an aromatase inhibitor improved progression-free survival in patients with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. (Funded by Novartis; BOLERO-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00863655.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis