The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research*

Nathalie Percie du Sert(National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research), Viki Hurst(National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research), Amrita Ahluwalia(Queen Mary University of London), Sabina Alam(Queen Mary University of London), Marc T. Avey(ICF International (United States)), Monya Baker(The Nature Conservancy), William J. Browne(University of Bristol), Alejandra Clark(University of Bristol), Innes C. Cuthill(University of Bristol), Ulrich Dirnagl(University of Bristol), Michael Emerson(Imperial College London), Paul Garner(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Stephen T. Holgate(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), David W. Howells(University of Tasmania), Natasha A. Karp(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Stanley E. Lazic(Prioris.ai (Canada)), Katie Lidster(National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research), Catriona MacCallum(Hindawi (United Kingdom)), Malcolm Macleod(University of Edinburgh), Esther J. Pearl(National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research), Ole H. Petersen(Cardiff University), Frances Rawle(Cardiff University), Penny S. Reynolds(University of Florida), Kieron Rooney(The University of Sydney), Emily S. Sena(Stroke Association), Shai D. Silberberg(Stroke Association), Thomas Steckler(Janssen (Belgium)), Hanno Würbel(University of Bern)
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
July 14, 2020
Cited by 1,310Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the “ARRIVE Essential 10,” which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the “Recommended Set,” which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis