The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

Nathalie Percie du Sert(National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research), Viki Hurst(National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research), Amrita Ahluwalia(Queen Mary University of London), Sabina Alam(Taylor Wimpey (United Kingdom)), Marc T. Avey(Family Health International 360), Monya Baker(The Nature Conservancy), William J. Browne(University of Bristol), Alejandra Clark(Cambridge Life Sciences (United Kingdom)), Innes C. Cuthill(University of Bristol), Ulrich Dirnagl(Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Michael Emerson(Lung Institute), Paul Garner(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Stephen T. Holgate(NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit), David W. Howells(University of Tasmania), Natasha A. Karp(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Stanley E. Lazic(Prioris.ai (Canada)), Katie Lidster(National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research), Catriona MacCallum(Hindawi (United Kingdom)), Malcolm Macleod(University of Edinburgh), Esther J. Pearl(National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research), Ole H. Petersen(Cardiff University), Frances Rawle(General Medical Council), Penny S. Reynolds(University of Florida), Kieron Rooney(The University of Sydney), Emily S. Sena(Stroke Association), Shai D. Silberberg(National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke), Thomas Steckler(Janssen (Belgium)), Hanno Würbel(University of Bern)
Experimental Physiology
July 14, 2020
Cited by 3,541Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into two sets, the 'ARRIVE Essential 10', which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the 'Recommended Set', which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis