Corrigendum to: Effectiveness of 3 Versus 6 ft of Physical Distancing for Controlling Spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Primary and Secondary Students and Staff: A Retrospective, Statewide Cohort Study
Polly van den Berg(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center), Westyn Branch‐Elliman(VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System), Isabella Epshtein(VA Boston Healthcare System), Richard Nelson(University of Utah), Emily Oster(Brown University), Elissa M. Schechter‐Perkins(Boston Medical Center), Rebecca Jack(University of Nebraska–Lincoln)
Cited by 6
Related Papers
Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19
|Western Journal of Emergency Medicine|2020|77
Effectiveness of 3 Versus 6 ft of Physical Distancing for Controlling Spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Primary and Secondary Students and Staff: A Retrospective, Statewide Cohort Study
|Clinical Infectious Diseases|2021|77
Multi-center evaluation of the cobas ® Liat ® Influenza A/B & RSV assay for rapid point of care diagnosis
|Journal of Clinical Virology|2017|76
Implementation and Preliminary Results of an Emergency Department Nontargeted, Opt‐out Hepatitis C Virus Screening Program
|Academic Emergency Medicine|2018|61
COVID-19 pandemic impacts on mental health, burnout, and longevity in the workplace among healthcare workers: A mixed methods study
|Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice|2023|57