Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources
Jodi Summers Holtrop(University of Colorado Denver), Russell E. Glasgow(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus), Bethany M. Kwan(Outcomes Research Consortium), Samantha M. Harden(Virginia Tech), Rachel C. Shelton(Columbia University), Borsika A. Rabin(University of California San Diego), Paul A. Estabrooks(University of Nebraska Medical Center), Rodger Kessler(Arizona State University), Diane K. King(University of Alaska Anchorage), Bridget Gaglio(Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), Marcia G. Ory(Texas A&M University)
Cited by 512
Related Papers
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
|American Journal of Public Health|1999|7.2k
The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.
|Diabetes Care|2000|2.6k
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
|Frontiers in Public Health|2019|2.5k
Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition
|American Journal of Public Health|2003|1.9k
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change
|Implementation Science|2013|1.8k