RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
Russell E. Glasgow(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus), Paul A. Estabrooks(University of Nebraska Medical Center), Gwenndolyn C. Porter(University of Nebraska Medical Center), Matthew Lee Smith(Texas A&M University), Borsika A. Rabin(University of Colorado Denver), Marcia G. Ory(Texas A&M University), Bridget Gaglio(Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), Samantha M. Harden(Virginia Tech)
Cited by 2,534
Related Papers
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
|American Journal of Public Health|1999|7.2k
The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.
|Diabetes Care|2000|2.6k
Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition
|American Journal of Public Health|2003|1.9k
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change
|Implementation Science|2013|1.8k
The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time
|American Journal of Public Health|2013|1.1k