Population-specific causal disease effect sizes in functionally important regions impacted by selection

Huwenbo Shi(Broad Institute), Steven Gazal(Broad Institute), Masahiro Kanai(Broad Institute), Evan Koch(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Armin Schoech(Broad Institute), Katherine M. Siewert(Broad Institute), Samuel S. Kim(Broad Institute), Yang Luo(Broad Institute), Tiffany Amariuta(Broad Institute), Hailiang Huang(Broad Institute), Yukinori Okada(The University of Osaka), Soumya Raychaudhuri(Broad Institute), Shamil Sunyaev(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Alkes L. Price(Broad Institute)
Nature Communications
February 17, 2021
Cited by 137Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Many diseases exhibit population-specific causal effect sizes with trans-ethnic genetic correlations significantly less than 1, limiting trans-ethnic polygenic risk prediction. We develop a new method, S-LDXR, for stratifying squared trans-ethnic genetic correlation across genomic annotations, and apply S-LDXR to genome-wide summary statistics for 31 diseases and complex traits in East Asians (average N = 90K) and Europeans (average N = 267K) with an average trans-ethnic genetic correlation of 0.85. We determine that squared trans-ethnic genetic correlation is 0.82× (s.e. 0.01) depleted in the top quintile of background selection statistic, implying more population-specific causal effect sizes. Accordingly, causal effect sizes are more population-specific in functionally important regions, including conserved and regulatory regions. In regions surrounding specifically expressed genes, causal effect sizes are most population-specific for skin and immune genes, and least population-specific for brain genes. Our results could potentially be explained by stronger gene-environment interaction at loci impacted by selection, particularly positive selection.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis