Craniometrics Reveal “Two Layers” of Prehistoric Human Dispersal in Eastern Eurasia

Hirofumi Matsumura(Sapporo Medical University), Hsiao‐chun Hung(Australian National University), Charles Higham(University of Otago), Chi Zhang(Peking University), Mariko Yamagata(Okayama University of Science), Lan Cuong Nguyen(Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences), Zhen Li(Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology), Xuechun Fan(Fujian Academy of Building Research (China)), Truman Simanjuntak(Indonesian Pediatric Society), Adhi Agus Oktaviana, Jianing He(Peking University), Chung-yu Chen(Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica), Chien-kuo Pan, Gang He(Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology), Guoping Sun, Weijin Huang(University of Nottingham Ningbo China), Xinwei Li(Chinese Academy of Social Sciences), Xingtao Wei(Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology), Kate Domett(Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine), Siân E. Halcrow(University of Otago), Kim Dung Nguyen(Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences), Hoang Hiep Trinh(Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences), Chi Hoang Bui(Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences), Khanh Trung Kien Nguyen(Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences), Andreas Reinecke(Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale)
Scientific Reports
February 5, 2019
Cited by 187Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

This cranio-morphometric study emphasizes a "two-layer model" for eastern Eurasian anatomically modern human (AMH) populations, based on large datasets of 89 population samples including findings directly from ancient archaeological contexts. Results suggest that an initial "first layer" of AMH had related closely to ancestral Andaman, Australian, Papuan, and Jomon groups who likely entered this region via the Southeast Asian landmass, prior to 65-50 kya. A later "second layer" shared strong cranial affinities with Siberians, implying a Northeast Asian source, evidenced by 9 kya in central China and then followed by expansions of descendant groups into Southeast Asia after 4 kya. These two populations shared limited initial exchange, and the second layer grew at a faster rate and in greater numbers, linked with contexts of farming that may have supported increased population densities. Clear dichotomization between the two layers implies a temporally deep divergence of distinct migration routes for AMH through both southern and northern Eurasia.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis