Doppler Flow Velocity and Thermodilution to Assess Coronary Flow Reserve
Henk Everaars(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Niels van Royen(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Ibrahim Danad(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Adriaan A. Lammertsma(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Peter M. van de Ven(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Roel S. Driessen(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Pieter G. Raijmakers(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Guus A. de Waard(Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Albert C. van Rossum(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc), Paul Knaapen(Amsterdam University Medical Centers)
Cited by 158
Related Papers
Anatomic Versus Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease
|Journal of the American College of Cardiology|2013|563
Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve
|JAMA Cardiology|2017|463
Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis
|Journal of the American College of Cardiology|2019|437
Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis
|European Heart Journal|2016|338
Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease
|Journal of the American College of Cardiology|2014|324