Biochemical and Epigenetic Insights into L-2-Hydroxyglutarate, a Potential Therapeutic Target in Renal Cancer

Sandeep B. Shelar(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Eun‐Hee Shim(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Garrett J. Brinkley(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Anirban Kundu(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Francesca Carobbio(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Tyler Poston(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Jubilee Tan(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Vishwas Parekh(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Daniel Benson(University of Alabama at Birmingham), David K. Crossman(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Phillip Buckhaults(University of South Carolina), Dinesh Rakheja(The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), Richard Kirkman(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Yusuke Sato(The University of Tokyo), Seishi Ogawa(The University of Tokyo), Shilpa Dutta(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Sadanandan E. Velu(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Ethan Emberley(Calithera (United States)), Alison Pan(Calithera (United States)), Jason Chen(Calithera (United States)), Tony Chieh‐Ting Huang(Calithera (United States)), Devin Absher(HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology), Anja Becker(Technische Universität Braunschweig), Conrad Kunick(Technische Universität Braunschweig), Sunil Sudarshan(University of Alabama at Birmingham)
Clinical Cancer Research
August 14, 2018
Cited by 101Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Elevation of L-2-hydroxylgutarate (L-2-HG) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is due in part to reduced expression of L-2-HG dehydrogenase (L2HGDH). However, the contribution of L-2-HG to renal carcinogenesis and insight into the biochemistry and targets of this small molecule remains to be elucidated. Experimental Design: Genetic and pharmacologic approaches to modulate L-2-HG levels were assessed for effects on in vitro and in vivo phenotypes. Metabolomics was used to dissect the biochemical mechanisms that promote L-2-HG accumulation in RCC cells. Transcriptomic analysis was utilized to identify relevant targets of L-2-HG. Finally, bioinformatic and metabolomic analyses were used to assess the L-2-HG/L2HGDH axis as a function of patient outcome and cancer progression. Results: L2HGDH suppresses both in vitro cell migration and in vivo tumor growth and these effects are mediated by L2HGDH's catalytic activity. Biochemical studies indicate that glutamine is the predominant carbon source for L-2-HG via the activity of malate dehydrogenase 2 (MDH2). Inhibition of the glutamine-MDH2 axis suppresses in vitro phenotypes in an L-2-HG–dependent manner. Moreover, in vivo growth of RCC cells with basal elevation of L-2-HG is suppressed by glutaminase inhibition. Transcriptomic and functional analyses demonstrate that the histone demethylase KDM6A is a target of L-2-HG in RCC. Finally, increased L-2-HG levels, L2HGDH copy loss, and lower L2HGDH expression are associated with tumor progression and/or worsened prognosis in patients with RCC. Conclusions: Collectively, our studies provide biochemical and mechanistic insight into the biology of this small molecule and provide new opportunities for treating L-2-HG–driven kidney cancers.


Related Papers