The Effect of Additives for Reflux or Dysphagia Management on Osmolality in Ready‐to‐Feed Preterm Formula: Practice Implications

Deborah Salle Levy(Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul), Erika K. Osborn(Nationwide Children's Hospital), Kathryn A. Hasenstab(Nationwide Children's Hospital), Saira Nawaz(Nationwide Children's Hospital), Sudarshan R. Jadcherla(Nationwide Children's Hospital)
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
July 10, 2018
Cited by 25Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A common osmolality threshold for feedings is to stay <450 mOsm/kg for normal infants. Preterm formulas are frequently modified to improve growth, modify nutrition, and manage gastroesophageal reflux (GER) or dysphagia. Relationships between osmolality and additives to ready-to-feed preterm formulas are unclear. Our aims were to evaluate and compare the effects of caloric density, thickening agent recipes, and supplements to ready-to-feed preterm formula on osmolality. METHODS: A freezing point osmometer was used to measure the osmolality of 47 preterm infant formula combinations with varying caloric densities (ready-to-feed 22 and 30 cal/oz), thickening agents (rice vs oatmeal cereal), thickener amounts (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 tsp/oz), and combinations of supplements (saline, iron, vitamin D, or multivitamin). Ten samples per combination were tested using a 10-μL pipette. Comparisons were made using analysis of variance and t-tests for group and pair-wise comparisons, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 470 osmolality samples were analyzed: (1) raters had high agreement (r = 0.98; P < .001); (2) for every 0.5 tsp/oz of thickener, the osmolality increases by 30 mOsm/kg (P < .001); (3) osmolality was higher with the oatmeal (vs rice) thickening agent (P < .001); and (4) vitamin and electrolyte supplement combinations increase osmolality. CONCLUSIONS: Alteration of ready-to-feed preterm formulas may significantly increase osmolality and have unintended consequences. Caution and monitoring should be exercised with modifying ready-to-feed preterm formulas for regurgitation, rumination, GER, dysphagia, feeding intolerance, or emesis. This study supports the concept of achieving volume tolerance before further manipulation of additives.


Related Papers