RAS Mutation Clinical Risk Score to Predict Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Kristoffer W. Brudvik(Oslo University Hospital), Robert Jones(University of Liverpool), Felice Giuliante(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Junichi Shindoh(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Guillaume Passot(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Michael Chung(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Juhee Song(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Liang Li(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Vegar Johansen Dagenborg(Oslo University Hospital), Åsmund Avdem Fretland(Oslo University Hospital), Bård I. Røsok(Oslo University Hospital), Agostino Maria De Rose(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Francesco Ardito(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Bjørn Edwin(Oslo University Hospital), Elena Panettieri(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Luigi Maria Larocca(Oslo University Hospital), Suguru Yamashita(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Claudius Conrad(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Thomas A. Aloia(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Graeme J. Poston(University of Liverpool), Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth(Oslo University Hospital), Jean‐Nicolas Vauthey(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Annals of Surgery
May 26, 2017
Cited by 271

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of RAS mutation status on the traditional clinical score (t-CS) to predict survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). BACKGROUND: The t-CS relies on the following factors: primary tumor nodal status, disease-free interval, number and size of CLM, and carcinoembryonic antigen level. We hypothesized that the addition of RAS mutation status could create a modified clinical score (m-CS) that would outperform the t-CS. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection of CLM from 2005 through 2013 and had RAS mutation status and t-CS factors available were included. Multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic factors to include in the m-CS. Log-rank survival analyses were used to compare the t-CS and the m-CS. The m-CS was validated in an international multicenter cohort of 608 patients. RESULTS: A total of 564 patients were eligible for analysis. RAS mutation was detected in 205 (36.3%) of patients. On multivariate analysis, RAS mutation was associated with poor overall survival, as were positive primary tumor lymph node status and diameter of the largest liver metastasis >50 mm. Each factor was assigned 1 point to produce a m-CS. The m-CS accurately stratified patients by overall and recurrence-free survival in both the initial patient series and validation cohort, whereas the t-CS did not. CONCLUSIONS: Modifying the t-CS by replacing disease-free interval, number of metastases, and CEA level with RAS mutation status produced an m-CS that outperformed the t-CS. The m-CS is therefore a simple validated tool that predicts survival after resection of CLM.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis