Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies.

David Rempel(University of California, San Francisco), Bradley Evanoff(Washington University in St. Louis), Peter C. Amadio(Mayo Clinic), Marc de Krom(Maastricht University), Gary M. Franklin(University of Washington), Alfred Franzblau(University of Michigan), Ronald H. Gray(Johns Hopkins University), F Gerr(Emory University), Mats Hagberg(University of Gothenburg), Thomas Hales(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), Jeffrey N. Katz(Harvard University Press), Glenn Pransky(University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School)
American Journal of Public Health
October 1, 1998
Cited by 527Open Access

Abstract

Criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome for use in epidemiologic studies were developed by means of a consensus process. Twelve medical researchers with experience in conducting epidemiologic studies of carpal tunnel syndrome participated in the process. The group reached agreement on several conceptual issues. First, there is no perfect gold standard for carpal tunnel syndrome. The combination of electrodiagnostic study findings and symptom characteristics will provide the most accurate information for classification of carpal tunnel syndrome. Second, use of only electrodiagnostic study findings is not recommended. Finally, in the absence of electrodiagnostic studies, specific combinations of symptom characteristics and physical examination findings may be useful in some settings but are likely to result in greater misclassification of disease status.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis