Surgery versus Physical Therapy for a Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis

Jeffrey N. Katz(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Robert H. Brophy(Washington University in St. Louis), Christine E. Chaisson, Leigh de Chaves(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Brian J. Cole(Rush University), Diane L. Dahm(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Laurel A. Donnell‐Fink(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Ali Guermazi, Amanda K. Haas(Washington University in St. Louis), Morgan H. Jones(Cleveland Clinic), Bruce A. Levy(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Lisa A. Mandl(Hospital for Special Surgery), Scott D. Martin(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Robert G. Marx(Hospital for Special Surgery), Anthony Miniaci(Cleveland Clinic), Matthew J. Matava(Washington University in St. Louis), Joseph Palmisano, Emily K. Reinke(Vanderbilt University), Brian E. Richardson(Vanderbilt University), Benjamin N. Rome(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Clare E. Safran‐Norton(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Debra Skoniecki(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Daniel H. Solomon(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Matthew V. Smith(Washington University in St. Louis), Kurt P. Spindler(Vanderbilt University), Michael J. Stuart(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), John Wright(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Rick W. Wright(Washington University in St. Louis), Elena Losina(Brigham and Women's Hospital)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 19, 2013
Cited by 652Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for symptomatic patients with a meniscal tear and knee osteoarthritis results in better functional outcomes than nonoperative therapy is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving symptomatic patients 45 years of age or older with a meniscal tear and evidence of mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis on imaging. We randomly assigned 351 patients to surgery and postoperative physical therapy or to a standardized physical-therapy regimen (with the option to cross over to surgery at the discretion of the patient and surgeon). The patients were evaluated at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the difference between the groups with respect to the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical-function score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms) 6 months after randomization. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean improvement in the WOMAC score after 6 months was 20.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9 to 23.9) in the surgical group and 18.5 (95% CI, 15.6 to 21.5) in the physical-therapy group (mean difference, 2.4 points; 95% CI, -1.8 to 6.5). At 6 months, 51 active participants in the study who were assigned to physical therapy alone (30%) had undergone surgery, and 9 patients assigned to surgery (6%) had not undergone surgery. The results at 12 months were similar to those at 6 months. The frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, we did not find significant differences between the study groups in functional improvement 6 months after randomization; however, 30% of the patients who were assigned to physical therapy alone underwent surgery within 6 months. (Funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; METEOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00597012.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis