Sequencing of <i>Culex quinquefasciatus</i> Establishes a Platform for Mosquito Comparative Genomics

Peter Arensburger(University of California, Riverside), Karyn Mégy(European Bioinformatics Institute), Robert M. Waterhouse(University of Geneva), Jenica Abrudan(University of Notre Dame), Paolo Amedeo(J. Craig Venter Institute), Beatriz Antelo(Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago), Lyric C. Bartholomay(Iowa State University), Shelby Bidwell(Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Elisabet Caler(J. Craig Venter Institute), Francisco Câmara Ferreira(Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Corey L. Campbell(Colorado State University), Kathryn S. Campbell(Harvard University Press), Claudio Casola(Indiana University Bloomington), Marta T. Castro(Duran i Reynals Hospital), Ishwar Chandramouliswaran(J. Craig Venter Institute), Sinéad B. Chapman(Broad Institute), Scott Christley(University of Notre Dame), Javier Costas(Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica), Eric Eisenstadt(J. Craig Venter Institute), Cédric Feschotte(The University of Texas at Arlington), Claire M. Fraser(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Roderic Guigó(Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Brian J. Haas(Broad Institute), M. Hammond(European Bioinformatics Institute), Bill S. Hansson(Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology), Janet Hemingway(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Sharon R. Hill(Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Clint Howarth(Broad Institute), Rickard Ignell(Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Ryan Kennedy(University of Notre Dame), Chinnappa D. Kodira(Enzo Life Sciences (United States)), Neil F. Lobo(University of Notre Dame), Chunhong Mao(Virginia Tech), George F. Mayhew(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Kristin Michel(Kansas State University), Akio Mori(University of Notre Dame), Nannan Liu(Auburn University), Horacio Naveira(Universidade da Coruña), Vishvanath Nene(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Nam Q. Nguyen(The University of Texas at Arlington), Matthew D. Pearson(Broad Institute), Ellen J. Pritham(The University of Texas at Arlington), Daniela Puiu(University of Maryland, College Park), Yumin Qi(Virginia Tech), Hilary Ranson(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), José M. C. Ribeiro(National Institutes of Health), Hugh M. Roberston(University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), David W. Severson(University of Notre Dame), Martin Shumway(National Institutes of Health), Mario Stanke(University of Göttingen), Robert L. Strausberg(J. Craig Venter Institute), Cheng Sun(The University of Texas at Arlington), Granger Sutton(J. Craig Venter Institute), Zhijian Tu(Virginia Tech), José M. C. Tubío(Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago), Maria Unger(University of Notre Dame), Dana L. Vanlandingham(Imperial College London), Albert J. Vilella(European Bioinformatics Institute), Owen White(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Jared White(Broad Institute), Charles S. Wondji(Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Jennifer R. Wortman(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Evgeny M. Zdobnov(University of Geneva), Bruce W. Birren(Broad Institute), Bruce M. Christensen(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Frank H. Collins(University of Notre Dame), Anthony J. Cornel(The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston), George Dimopoulos(Johns Hopkins University), Linda I. Hannick(J. Craig Venter Institute), Stephen Higgs(Imperial College London), Gregory C. Lanzaro(University of California, Davis), Daniel Lawson(European Bioinformatics Institute), Norman H. Lee(George Washington University), Marc A. T. Muskavitch(Boston College), Alexander S. Raikhel(University of California, Riverside), Peter W. Atkinson(University of California, Riverside)
Science
September 30, 2010
Cited by 486Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Closing the Vector Circle The genome sequence of Culex quinquefasciatus offers a representative of the third major genus of mosquito disease vectors for comparative analysis. In a major international effort, Arensburger et al. (p. 86 ) uncovered divergences in the C. quinquefasciatus genome compared with the representatives of the other two genera Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae . The main difference noted is the expansion of numbers of genes, particularly for immunity, oxidoreductive functions, and digestive enzymes, which may reflect specific aspects of the Culex life cycle. Bartholomay et al. (p. 88 ) explored infection-response genes in Culex in more depth and uncovered 500 immune response-related genes, similar to the numbers seen in Aedes , but fewer than seen in Anopheles or the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster . The higher numbers of genes were attributed partly to expansions in those encoding serpins, C-type lectins, and fibrinogen-related proteins, consistent with greater immune surveillance and associated signaling needed to monitor the dangers of breeding in polluted, urbanized environments. Transcriptome analysis confirmed that inoculation with unfamiliar bacteria prompted strong immune responses in Culex . The worm and virus pathogens that the mosquitoes transmit naturally provoked little immune activation, however, suggesting that tolerance has evolved to any damage caused by replication of the pathogens in the insects.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis