Continuous Lenalidomide Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Antonio Palumbo(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista), Roman Hájek(Masaryk University), Michel Delforge, Martin Kropff(University of Münster), Maria Teresa Petrucci(Sapienza University of Rome), John Catalano(Monash University), Heinz Gisslinger(Medical University of Vienna), W Wiktor-Jędrzejczak(Medical University of Warsaw), Mamia Zodelava(Chemotherapy Foundation), Katja Weisel(University of Tübingen), Nicola Cascavilla(Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza), Genadi Iosava(Institute for Transfusion Medicine), Michèle Cavo(GNA University), Janusz Kłoczko(Medical University of Białystok), Joan Bladé(Hospital Clínic de Barcelona), Meral Beksaç(Ankara University), Ivan Špıčka(Charles University), Torben Plesner(Vejle Sygehus), J. Radke(University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus), Christian Langer(Universität Ulm), Dina Ben Yehuda(Hadassah Medical Center), Alessandro Corso(Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione), Lindsay Herbein, Zhinuan Yu, Jay Mei, Christian Jacques, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)
New England Journal of Medicine
May 9, 2012
Cited by 737Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide has tumoricidal and immunomodulatory activity against multiple myeloma. This double-blind, multicenter, randomized study compared melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance (MPR-R) with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) or melphalan-prednisone (MP) followed by placebo in patients 65 years of age or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who were ineligible for transplantation to receive MPR-R (nine 4-week cycles of MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy until a relapse or disease progression occurred [152 patients]) or to receive MPR (153 patients) or MP (154 patients) without maintenance therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 30 months. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with MPR-R (31 months) than with MPR (14 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; P<0.001) or MP (13 months; hazard ratio, 0.40; P<0.001). Response rates were superior with MPR-R and MPR (77% and 68%, respectively, vs. 50% with MP; P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively, for the comparison with MP). The progression-free survival benefit associated with MPR-R was noted in patients 65 to 75 years of age but not in those older than 75 years of age (P=0.001 for treatment-by-age interaction). After induction therapy, a landmark analysis showed a 66% reduction in the rate of progression with MPR-R (hazard ratio for the comparison with MPR, 0.34; P<0.001) that was age-independent. During induction therapy, the most frequent adverse events were hematologic; grade 4 neutropenia was reported in 35%, 32%, and 8% of the patients in the MPR-R, MPR, and MP groups, respectively. The 3-year rate of second primary tumors was 7% with MPR-R, 7% with MPR, and 3% with MP. CONCLUSIONS: MPR-R significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation, with the greatest benefit observed in patients 65 to 75 years of age. (Funded by Celgene; MM-015 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00405756.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis