<i>BRAF/NRAS</i> Mutation Frequencies Among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients With Melanoma

Maria Colombino(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Mariaelena Capone(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Amelia Lissia(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Antonio Cossu(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Corrado Rubino(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Vincenzo De Giorgi(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Daniela Massi(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Ester Fonsatti(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Stefania Staibano(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Oscar Nappi(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Elena Pagani(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Milena Casula(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari), Antonella Manca(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari), Maria Cristina Sini(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari), Renato Franco(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Gerardo Botti(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Corrado Caracò(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Nicola Mozzillo(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Paolo A. Ascierto(Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare), Giuseppe Palmieri(Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 21, 2012
Cited by 460Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prevalence of BRAF, NRAS, and p16CDKN2A mutations during melanoma progression remains inconclusive. We investigated the prevalence and distribution of mutations in these genes in different melanoma tissues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 291 tumor tissues from 132 patients with melanoma were screened. Paired samples of primary melanomas (n = 102) and synchronous or asynchronous metastases from the same patients (n = 165) were included. Tissue samples underwent mutation analysis (automated DNA sequencing). Secondary lesions included lymph nodes (n = 84), and skin (n = 36), visceral (n = 25), and brain (n = 44) sites. RESULTS: BRAF/NRAS mutations were identified in 58% of primary melanomas (43% BRAF; 15% NRAS); 62% in lymph nodes, 61% subcutaneous, 56% visceral, and 70% in brain sites. Mutations were observed in 63% of metastases (48% BRAF; 15% NRAS), a nonsignificant increase in mutation frequency after progression from primary melanoma. Of the paired samples, lymph nodes (93% consistency) and visceral metastases (96% consistency) presented a highly similar distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutations versus primary melanomas, with a significantly less consistent pattern in brain (80%) and skin metastases (75%). This suggests that independent subclones are generated in some patients. p16CDKN2A mutations were identified in 7% and 14% of primary melanomas and metastases, with a low consistency (31%) between secondary and primary tumor samples. CONCLUSION: In the era of targeted therapies, assessment of the spectrum and distribution of alterations in molecular targets among patients with melanoma is needed. Our findings about the prevalence of BRAF/NRAS/p16CDKN2A mutations in paired tumor lesions from patients with melanoma may be useful in the management of this disease.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis