Nivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma without <i>BRAF</i> Mutation

Caroline Robert(Institut Gustave Roussy), Georgina V. Long(Melanoma Institute Australia), Benjamin Brady(Cabrini Hospital), Caroline Dutriaux(Hôpital Saint-André), Michele Maio(University of Siena), Laurent Mortier(Hôpital Claude Huriez), Jessica C. Hassel(National Center for Tumor Diseases), Piotr Rutkowski(The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology), Catriona M. McNeil(Melanoma Institute Australia), Ewa Kalinka‐Warzocha, Kerry J. Savage(BC Cancer Agency), Micaela Hernberg(Helsinki University Hospital), Célèste Lebbé(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), J. Charles(Inserm), Catalin Mihalcioiu(Royal Victoria Hospital), Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni(Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Cornelia Mauch(Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie), Francesco Cognetti, Ana Arance(Hospital Clínic de Barcelona), Henrik Schmidt(Aarhus University Hospital), Dirk Schadendorf, Helen Gogas(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), L. Lundgren-Eriksson, Christine E. Horak(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Brian J. Sharkey(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Ian M. Waxman(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Victoria Atkinson(Greenslopes Private Hospital), Paolo A. Ascierto(Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale")
New England Journal of Medicine
November 16, 2014
Cited by 5,339Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab was associated with higher rates of objective response than chemotherapy in a phase 3 study involving patients with ipilimumab-refractory metastatic melanoma. The use of nivolumab in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma has not been tested in a phase 3 controlled study. METHODS: We randomly assigned 418 previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks and dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks and nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: At 1 year, the overall rate of survival was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 78.9) in the nivolumab group, as compared with 42.1% (95% CI, 33.0 to 50.9) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.42; 99.79% CI, 0.25 to 0.73; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the nivolumab group versus 2.2 months in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death or progression of disease, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 40.0% (95% CI, 33.3 to 47.0) in the nivolumab group versus 13.9% (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.4) in the dacarbazine group (odds ratio, 4.06; P<0.001). The survival benefit with nivolumab versus dacarbazine was observed across prespecified subgroups, including subgroups defined by status regarding the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Common adverse events associated with nivolumab included fatigue, pruritus, and nausea. Drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 11.7% of the patients treated with nivolumab and 17.6% of those treated with dacarbazine. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, as compared with dacarbazine, among previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 066 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01721772.).


Related Papers