Lapatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Letrozole and Placebo As First-Line Therapy for Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Stephen Johnston(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), John Pippen(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Xavier Pivot(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Mikhail Lichinitser(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Saeed Sadeghi(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Véronique Dièras(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Henry Gómez(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Gilles Romieu(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Alexey Manikhas(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), M. John Kennedy(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Michael F. Press(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), J. Maltzman(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Allison Florance(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Lisa O’Rourke(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Cristina Oliva(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Steven Stein(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)), Mark D. Pegram(GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom))
Journal of Clinical Oncology
September 29, 2009
Cited by 1,024Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cross-talk between human epidermal growth factor receptors and hormone receptor pathways may cause endocrine resistance in breast cancer. This trial evaluated the effect of adding lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with HR-positive MBC were randomly assigned to daily letrozole (2.5 mg orally) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg orally) or letrozole and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the HER2-positive population. Results In HR-positive, HER2-positive patients (n = 219), addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression versus letrozole-placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; P = .019); median PFS was 8.2 v 3.0 months, respectively. Clinical benefit (responsive or stable disease >or= 6 months) was significantly greater for lapatinib-letrozole versus letrozole-placebo (48% v 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P = .003). Patients with centrally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors (n = 952) had no improvement in PFS. A preplanned Cox regression analysis identified prior antiestrogen therapy as a significant factor in the HER2-negative population; a nonsignificant trend toward prolonged PFS for lapatinib-letrozole was seen in patients who experienced relapse less than 6 months since prior tamoxifen discontinuation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P = .117). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the lapatinib-letrozole arm versus letrozole-placebo arm (diarrhea, 10% v 1%; rash, 1% v 0%, respectively), but they were manageable. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that a combined targeted strategy with letrozole and lapatinib significantly enhances PFS and clinical benefit rates in patients with MBC that coexpresses HR and HER2.


Related Papers