Allison Florance

PURPOSE: Cross-talk between human epidermal growth factor receptors and hormone receptor pathways may cause endocrine resistance in breast cancer. This trial evaluated the effect of adding lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with HR-positive MBC were randomly assigned to daily letrozole (2.5 mg orally) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg orally) or letrozole and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the HER2-positive population. Results In HR-positive, HER2-positive patients (n = 219), addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression versus letrozole-placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; P = .019); median PFS was 8.2 v 3.0 months, respectively. Clinical benefit (responsive or stable disease >or= 6 months) was significantly greater for lapatinib-letrozole versus letrozole-placebo (48% v 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P = .003). Patients with centrally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors (n = 952) had no improvement in PFS. A preplanned Cox regression analysis identified prior antiestrogen therapy as a significant factor in the HER2-negative population; a nonsignificant trend toward prolonged PFS for lapatinib-letrozole was seen in patients who experienced relapse less than 6 months since prior tamoxifen discontinuation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P = .117). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the lapatinib-letrozole arm versus letrozole-placebo arm (diarrhea, 10% v 1%; rash, 1% v 0%, respectively), but they were manageable. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that a combined targeted strategy with letrozole and lapatinib significantly enhances PFS and clinical benefit rates in patients with MBC that coexpresses HR and HER2.

PURPOSE: Phase III EGF104900 data demonstrated that lapatinib plus trastuzumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit rate versus lapatinib monotherapy, offering a chemotherapy-free option for patients with heavily pretreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Final planned overall survival (OS) analysis from EGF104900 is reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive MBC whose disease progressed during prior trastuzumab-based therapies were randomly assigned to receive lapatinib monotherapy or lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab. OS and updated PFS data are presented using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests stratified for hormone receptor and visceral disease status. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify characteristics of patients deriving the greatest clinical benefit. RESULTS: In this updated final analysis of all patients randomly assigned with strata (n = 291), lapatinib plus trastuzumab continued to show superiority to lapatinib monotherapy in PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.94; P = .011) and offered significant OS benefit (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.97; P = .026). Improvements in absolute OS rates were 10% at 6 months and 15% at 12 months in the combination arm compared with the monotherapy arm. Multiple baseline factors, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, nonvisceral disease, < three metastatic sites, and less time from initial diagnosis until random assignment, were associated with improved OS. Incidence of adverse events was consistent with previously reported rates. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrated a significant 4.5-month median OS advantage with the lapatinib and trastuzumab combination and support dual HER2 blockade in patients with heavily pretreated HER2-positive MBC.

We prospectively investigated the large-scale implementation of a respiratory-therapist-driven protocol (TDP) that included 117 respiratory care practitioners (RCPs) managing 1,067 patients with respiratory failure over 9,048 patient days of mechanical ventilation. During a 12-mo period, we reintroduced a previously validated protocol that included a daily screen (DS) coupled with spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) and physician prompt, as a TDP without daily input from a physician or "weaning team." With graded, staged educational interventions at 2-mo intervals, RCPs had a 97% completion rate and a 95% correct interpretation rate for the DS. The frequency with which patients who passed the DS underwent SBTs increased throughout the implementation process (p < 0.001). As the year progressed, RCPs more often considered SBTs once patients had passed a DS (p < 0.001), and physicians ordered more SBTs (46 versus 65%, p = 0.004). Overall, SBTs were ordered more often on the medicine than on the surgical services (81 versus 63%, p = 0.001), likely reflecting medical intensivists' prior use of this protocol. Important barriers to protocol compliance were identified through a questionnaire (89 respondents, 76%), and included: Physician unfamiliarity with the protocol, RCP inconsistency in seeking an order for an SBT from the physician, specific reasons cited by the physician for not advancing the patient to a SBT, and lack of stationary unit assignments by RCPs performing the protocol. We conclude that implementation of a validated weaning strategy is feasible as a TDP without daily supervision from a weaning physician or team. RCPs can appropriately perform and interpret DS data more than 95% of the time, but significant barriers to SBTs exist. Through a staged implementation process, using periodic reinforcement of all participants in ventilator management, improved compliance with this large-scale weaning protocol can be achieved.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of letrozole plus lapatinib versus letrozole plus placebo in women with hormone receptor (HR)(+) human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2(+) tumors receiving first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women (n = 1,286) with HR(+) MBC were randomized to daily oral treatment with letrozole (2.5 mg) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg) versus letrozole (2.5 mg) plus placebo. Of the 1,286 patients enrolled in the phase III study, 219 had HER-2(+) tumors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in HER-2(+) patients. RESULTS: Results in the HR(+) HER-2(+) population (n = 219) are presented. The addition of lapatinib to letrozole resulted in a significantly lower risk for disease progression than with letrozole alone (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.96). The PFS time was 8.2 months, versus 3.0 months. The objective response rate (ORR) (28% versus 15%) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) (48% versus 29%) were also significantly greater in lapatinib-treated women. The most common adverse events in the lapatinib group were diarrhea (68%) and rash (46%), primarily grade 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of lapatinib to letrozole is well tolerated and leads to a significantly greater PFS time, ORR, and CBR than with letrozole alone in women with MBC who coexpress HR and HER-2.

1015 Background: Lapatinib (L) is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of EGFR and HER2 with a mechanism of action distinct from that of trastuzumab (T). Preclinical data suggest synergy between L and T. We studied L alone and in combination with T in pts with HER2+ MBC who progressed on T. Methods: Eligible women had received prior anthracycline and taxane therapy, had MBC with measurable lesions or bone-only disease, and had progressed on prior T-containing therapy. Pts were stratified by hormone receptor status and visceral/nonvisceral disease, then randomized to receive either L (1,500 mg QD) or L (1,000 mg QD) plus T (2 mg/kg weekly after 4 mg/kg loading dose). If pts progressed on the L arm, they could cross over to the L+T arm. The primary endpoint was PFS (investigator assessment), and secondary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 24 wks, RR, and OS. Results: 296 pts were randomized. All pts had received prior T; the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 6. Combination therapy significantly improved PFS and CBR; RR and OS were similar in both arms (Table). Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated. Grade 1/2 diarrhea was higher in the L+T arm (53% vs 41%); acneiform rash was more common in the L-alone arm, likely due to higher L dose. Asymptomatic decline in LVEF (> 20% and below LLN) occurred in 5% of pts in L+T arm and 2% of pts in L-alone arm. 1 death occurred due to cardiac toxicity in the L+T arm. Conclusions: This is the largest study of 2 targeted agents in HER2+ MBC and the first to demonstrate the synergy of L+T in a phase III setting. Improved clinical outcome was achieved with the combination of L+T in pts progressing on T-based therapy and without a substantial change in the side effect profile. The role of combined anti-HER2 therapy, in combination with chemotherapy, in less heavily pretreated patients with early stage disease is ongoing in the ALTTO (Adjuvant L and/or T Treatment Optimization) study. Endpoint L L + T Hazard/OR 95% CI P value PFS (median, wks) * 8.4 12.0 0.77 0.6, 1.0 0.029 CBR (%) * 13.2 25.2 2.1 1.1, 4.2 0.020 RR (%) * 6.9 10.3 1.5 0.6, 3.9 0.46 OS (median, wks) 39 51.6 0.75 0.5, 1.1 0.106 * Intent to treat. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Expert Testimony Other Remuneration GlaxoSmithKline Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline GlaxoSmithKline GlaxoSmithKline GlaxoSmithKline