Evaluation of a Telephone Advice System for Remote Intravenous Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke

Dipankar Dutta(Salisbury District Hospital), Jason Kendall(Salisbury District Hospital), Clare Holmes(Salisbury District Hospital), Peter J. Murphy(Salisbury District Hospital), Toby Black(Salisbury District Hospital), Robert F. Whiting(Salisbury District Hospital), Kash Aujla(Salisbury District Hospital), Sarah Caine(Salisbury District Hospital), Kate Hellier(Salisbury District Hospital), D. Walters(Salisbury District Hospital)
Stroke
January 21, 2015
Cited by 11Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is limited evidence for remote stroke thrombolysis using telephone consultation and teleradiology. Results from a UK network using this treatment model are presented. METHODS: Retrospective study of consecutive patients thrombolysed in 5 hospitals, with well organized stroke services, between 2012 and 2013. Remote thrombolysis was compared with thrombolysis delivered in person for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, death within 7 days, and 90-day modified Rankin scores. RESULTS: Of 586 patients, 220 (37.5%) were thrombolysed remotely. The 2 groups were well matched (median age 77 years, NIHSS 12). Remote thrombolysis increased treatment time by 22 minutes. Outcomes were no different in the 2 groups (remote versus standard): symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (3.6% versus 4.6%), death within 7 days (6.4% versus 7.1%), modified Rankin score <2 (46.0% versus 46.1%), and modified Rankin score 6 (15% versus 17.5%) at 90 days. CONCLUSION: Telephone advice and teleradiology, within an organized system of care, can be an effective method of delivery of intravenous thrombolysis.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis