The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology

Ramy K. Aziz(University of Tennessee Health Science Center), Daniela Bartels(University of Chicago), Aaron A. Best(Hope College), Matthew DeJongh(Hope College), T. Disz(Argonne National Laboratory), Robert A. Edwards(Argonne National Laboratory), Kevin Formsma(Hope College), Svetlana Gerdes, Elizabeth M. Glass(Argonne National Laboratory), Michael Kubal(University of Chicago), Folker Meyer(Argonne National Laboratory), Gary J. Olsen(Argonne National Laboratory), Robert Olson(Argonne National Laboratory), Andrei L. Osterman(Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute), Ross Overbeek, Leslie Klis McNeil(University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Daniel Paarmann(University of Chicago), Tobias Paczian(University of Chicago), Bruce Parrello, Gordon D. Pusch(University of Chicago), Claudia I. Reich(University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Rick Stevens(Argonne National Laboratory), Olga Vassieva, Veronika Vonstein, Andreas Wilke(University of Chicago), Olga Zagnitko
BMC Genomics
February 8, 2008
Cited by 11,787Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of prokaryotic genome sequences becoming available is growing steadily and is growing faster than our ability to accurately annotate them. DESCRIPTION: We describe a fully automated service for annotating bacterial and archaeal genomes. The service identifies protein-encoding, rRNA and tRNA genes, assigns functions to the genes, predicts which subsystems are represented in the genome, uses this information to reconstruct the metabolic network and makes the output easily downloadable for the user. In addition, the annotated genome can be browsed in an environment that supports comparative analysis with the annotated genomes maintained in the SEED environment. The service normally makes the annotated genome available within 12-24 hours of submission, but ultimately the quality of such a service will be judged in terms of accuracy, consistency, and completeness of the produced annotations. We summarize our attempts to address these issues and discuss plans for incrementally enhancing the service. CONCLUSION: By providing accurate, rapid annotation freely to the community we have created an important community resource. The service has now been utilized by over 120 external users annotating over 350 distinct genomes.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis