Breast cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK, 2000-2007: a population-based study

The ICBP Module 1 Working Group20(Cancer Research UK), Sarah Walters(Cancer Research UK), Camille Maringe(Cancer Research UK), J. Butler(Cancer Research UK), Bernard Rachet(Velindre NHS Trust), Peter Barrett‐Lee(Velindre NHS Trust), Jonas Bergh(Karolinska Institutet), John Boyages(Aarhus University Hospital), Peer Christiansen(Aarhus University Hospital), M. Lee(Uppsala University Hospital), Fredrik Wärnberg(Uppsala University Hospital), Claudia Allemani(Cancer Research UK), Gerda Engholm(Stockholm South General Hospital), Tommy� Fornander(Statens Serum Institut), ML Gjerstorff(Statens Serum Institut), Tom Børge Johannesen(West Midlands Police), Gill Lawrence(BC Cancer Agency), C E McGahan(BC Cancer Agency), Richard Middleton(Welsh Government), John Steward(Cancer Institute of New South Wales), Elizabeth Tracey(Cancer Institute of New South Wales), Donna Turner(CancerCare Manitoba), Martin Richards(Cancer Research UK), Michel P. Coleman(Cancer Research UK)
British Journal of Cancer
February 28, 2013
Cited by 248Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigate whether differences in breast cancer survival in six high-income countries can be explained by differences in stage at diagnosis using routine data from population-based cancer registries. METHODS: We analysed the data on 257,362 women diagnosed with breast cancer during 2000-7 and registered in 13 population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Flexible parametric hazard models were used to estimate net survival and the excess hazard of dying from breast cancer up to 3 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: Age-standardised 3-year net survival was 87-89% in the UK and Denmark, and 91-94% in the other four countries. Stage at diagnosis was relatively advanced in Denmark: only 30% of women had Tumour, Nodes, Metastasis (TNM) stage I disease, compared with 42-45% elsewhere. Women in the UK had low survival for TNM stage III-IV disease compared with other countries. CONCLUSION: International differences in breast cancer survival are partly explained by differences in stage at diagnosis, and partly by differences in stage-specific survival. Low overall survival arises if the stage distribution is adverse (e.g. Denmark) but stage-specific survival is normal; or if the stage distribution is typical but stage-specific survival is low (e.g. UK). International differences in staging diagnostics and stage-specific cancer therapies should be investigated.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis