Leaderboards/Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Last updated June 1, 2026

Rising Stars

New and hot

Rising Stars Researchers

Insufficient data

Rising Stars Papers

Insufficient data

Emerging Leaders

Gaining momentum

Emerging Leaders Researchers

1
Tina Košuta
Institute for Medical Informatics and Biostatistics
99
2
Sean C. Rife
Murray State University
50

Emerging Leaders Papers

1
The impact of bias due to exponentiation in the estimation of hazard, risk, and odds ratios: an empirical investigation from 1,495,059 effect sizes from MEDLINE/PubMed abstracts
BMC Medical Research Methodology|2025
1 cit.
2
Content-aware rankings: a new approach to rankings in scholarship
ArXiv.org|2025
1 cit.
3
Reply to Bakker et al.
Hypothesis Research Journal for Health Information Professionals|2025
0 cit.

All-Time Leaders

The canon

All-Time Leaders Researchers

1
John Geddes
University of Oxford
92
2
Brian H Willis
University of Birmingham
90
3
Hilary Thomson
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
84
4
David Moher
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
82
5
Douglas G. Altman
University of Oxford
81
6
Hang Wu
Harbin Institute of Technology
77
7
Sinéad Langan
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
71
8
Lisa Bero
University of Sydney
70
9
Mari Kangasniemi
University of Turku
69
10
Gillian Lancaster
Lancaster University
68

All-Time Leaders Papers

1
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
BMJ|2010
9k cit.
2
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement
PLoS Medicine|2015
5.2k cit.
3
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
BMJ|2020
3.8k cit.
4
Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide
Journal of Advanced Nursing|2016
3.7k cit.
5
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 21 Antidepressant Drugs for the Acute Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
The Lancet|2018
3.4k cit.
6
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials
BMJ|2016
3.4k cit.
7
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
European Journal of Epidemiology|2016
3.1k cit.
8
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
JAMA|2018
3k cit.
9
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials
Pilot and Feasibility Studies|2016
3k cit.
10
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Health Technology Assessment|2003
2.9k cit.

Indexing Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Reagents

Citation data for reagents in this field is currently compiling.