Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
David Moher(Ottawa Hospital), A. Liberati(University of Modena and Reggio Emilia), Jennifer Tetzlaff(Ottawa Hospital Research Institute), Douglas G. Altman(University of Oxford), for the PRISMA Group
Cited by 83,158Open Access
Abstract
Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings, systematic review registration number Flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review No of records identified through database searching No of additional records identified through other sources No of records after duplicates removed No of studies included in qualitative synthesis No of studies included in quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis)
Related Papers
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al.|Annals of Internal Medicine|2009|10.4k