S

Samuel C. Silverstein

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Publishes on Cell Adhesion Molecules Research, Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology, Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms. 140 papers and 14.7k citations.

140Publications
14.7kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Endocytosis
Samuel C. Silverstein, Ralph M. Steinman, Zanvil A. Cohn|Annual Review of Biochemistry|1977
Cited by 1.3k

The Hippo pathway was initially discovered in Drosophila melanogaster as a key regulator of tissue growth. It is an evolutionarily conserved signaling cascade regulating numerous biological processes, including cell growth and fate decision, organ size ...Read More

Legionnaires' Disease Bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) Multiplies Intracellularly in Human Monocytes
Marcus A. Horwitz, Samuel C. Silverstein|Journal of Clinical Investigation|1980
Cited by 639Open Access

We have studied the interaction between virulent egg yolk-grown Legionella pneumophila Philadelphia 1 and human blood monocytes in vitro. The leukocytes were cultured in antibiotic-free tissue culture medium supplemented with 15% autologous human serum.L. pneumophila multiplied several logs, as measured by colony-forming units, when incubated with monocytes or mononuclear cells; the mid-log phase doubling time was 2 h. The level to which L. pneumophila multiplied was proportional to the number of mononuclear cells in the culture. L. pneumophila multiplied only in the adherent fraction of the mononuclear cell population indicating that monocytes but not lymphocytes support growth of the bacteria. Peak growth of L. pneumophila was correlated with destruction of the monocyte monolayer. By fluorescence microscopy using fluorescein conjugated rabbit anti-L. pneumophila antiserum, the number of monocytes containing L. pneumophila increased in parallel with bacterial growth in the culture. At the peak of infection, monocytes were packed full with organisms. By electron microscopy, L. pneumophila in such monocytes were found in membrane-bound cytoplasmic vacuoles studded with structures resembling host cell ribosomes. Several lines of evidence indicate that L. pneumophila grows within monocytes. (a) In the absence of leukocytes, L. pneumophila did not grow in tissue culture medium with or without serum even if the medium was conditioned by monocytes. (b) L. pneumophila did not grow in sonicated mononuclear cells. Lysis of these cells at various times during logarithmic growth of L. pneumophila was followed by cessation of bacterial multiplication. Growth resumed when intact mononuclear cells were added back to the culture. (3) In parabiotic chambers separated by 0.1-mum Nuclepore filters, L. pneumophila multiplied only when placed on the same side of the filter as mononuclear cells. These findings indicate that L. pneumophila falls into a select category of bacterial pathogens that evade host defenses by parasitizing monocytes. It remains to be determined whether cell-mediated immunity plays a dominant role in host defense against L. pneumophila as it does against other intracellular pathogens.

Studies of the macrophage complement receptor. Alteration of receptor function upon macrophage activation.
Celso Bianco, F M Griffin, Samuel C. Silverstein|The Journal of Experimental Medicine|1975
Cited by 516Open Access

We have examined the roles of Fc receptors and complement receptors in mediating the interaction of sensitized sheep erythrocytes (E) with activated and with nonactivated mouse peritoneal macrophages. Both activated and nonactivated macrophages ingest IgG-coated erythrocytes [E(IgG)]; activated cells intest 1.5-2 times as man E(IgG) as do nonactivated macrophages. Thus, there is a quantitative difference in Fc receptor-mediated ingestion between activated and nonactivated macrophages. There is, however, a qualitative difference in function of complement receptors of activated and nonactivated macrophages. Nonactivated macrophages avidly bind complement-coated E [E(IgM)Ia1, but do not ingest them to a significant degree. Activated macrophages, on the other hand, bind and ingest E(IgM)C. The possibility of Fc receptor participation in mediating ingestion of E(IgM)C by activated macrophages was eliminated by blocking Fc receptors with an antimacrophage IgG fraction. Activated macrophages treated with antimacrophage IgG did not ingest E(igG) but did ingest both E(IgM)C AND E(IgM)C. Nonactivated macrophages treated with antimacrophage IgG did not interact at all with E(IgG). These cells bound, but did not ingest, E(IgM)C and E(IgM)C. Complement receptor-mediated ingestion is a marker for macrophage activation and may be physiologically important in the elimination of complement-coated particles.