David Staff

OBJECTIVE: Starting July 1, 2001, Medicare began to reimburse for screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic adults older than 50 yr with no risk factors for colorectal cancer. We sought to determine the short-term impact of the change in Medicare reimbursement on the demand for and yield of screening colonoscopy at our tertiary institution. METHODS: Asymptomatic patients older than 50 referred for first screening colonoscopy after the change in Medicare reimbursement from July 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001 were compared with a similar cohort screened before Medicare coverage for a family history of cancer or polyps during the same months the previous year (July 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000). Patient demographics, number, size, location, and histology of polyps/cancers for these screening colonoscopies were collected. RESULTS: A total of 1282 colonoscopies were performed in our institution from July 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001, 257 (20%) for screening. During the same months in the previous year, 121 of 938 colonoscopies (12.9%) were for screening (p < 0.01). This was a 55% increase in the percentage of colonoscopies performed for screening, and a 112% increase in the number of screening colonoscopies. Patients screened after the change in Medicare reimbursement were on average 5 yr older compared with patients of the previous year (62 +/- 10 [mean +/- SD] vs 56 +/- 9 yr; p < 0.01). A total of 61 screening colonoscopies (24%) performed after the change in Medicare reimbursement had adenomatous lesions, compared with 25 (21%) screened for family history (p = ns). The number of adenomas 10 mm or larger or cancers did not differ significantly between the two groups (17 in 2001 vs 12 in 2000; p = ns). Age of 65 or older was associated with detection of adenomatous lesions (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.01-2.9013). CONCLUSIONS: Since the change in Medicare reimbursement, there has been a significant increase in the number and proportion of colonoscopies performed for screening at our institution. Patients screened since this change are older, and the detection rate of neoplastic lesions is similar to those previously screened for a family history of colorectal cancer or polyps.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic screening of cirrhotics for large esophageal varices (EV) is advocated before initiation of prophylactic therapy for variceal bleeding. Conscious sedation for conventional endoscopy is problematic in cirrhotic patients because of risk of prolonged encephalopathy. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy (T-EGD) is a new technique, which allows for unsedated examination because it is well tolerated. The aims of this study were to determine whether T-EGD is feasible for screening of cirrhotic patients for presence of EV and to compare the diagnostic yield of T-EGD with conventional endoscopy for detecting and grading of EV. METHODS: Fifteen cirrhotics with no history of variceal bleeding, known EV, severe thrombocytopenia, or recurrent epistaxis were evaluated by unsedated T-EGD using a 5.3-mm outer diameter endoscope. Immediately afterward, a different endoscopist, blinded to T-EGD findings, performed sedated conventional endoscopy in standard fashion. The presence and size of EV, gastric varices, and other findings were recorded. Patient tolerance was also evaluated. RESULTS: Both modalities detected EV in the same 10 and gastric varices in the same two patients and completely agreed on size of EV. No stigmata of recent variceal bleeding were noted. Average time for unsedated T-EGD was 5 min 6 s. All patients found both procedures acceptable overall, with no significant difference in choking, discomfort, and sore throat. One patient developed self-limited epistaxis after T-EGD. CONCLUSIONS: 1) EV are accurately detected and graded by T-EGD in cirrhotic patients. 2) T-EGD is a safe and less costly screening alternative for EV in cirrhotic patients.